Also for the record, and just for the record, I don't think "He didn't want to damage the centipede cab with modular cps" is a good justification for that hodgepodge of controls.
Keeping the centipede cab in tact means nothing if you are going to put a Kmart checkout isle looking eyesore on top of it.
Imho a classic cab like that has NO business having a frakenpanel mounted to it. A tasteful custom panel in the spirit of the design would look nice, but preservation can't be used as an excuse when the modification doesn't "preserve" the original look and feel of the cab.
My point is there is no excuse for making an unsightly panel other than you didn't have the talent/foreshight/whatever to make a nicer one.
I'm not getting into the panel debates again, I just wanted to point out that if you make a cluttered panel you need to simply admit that you made a cluttered one and not throw out a million poor justifications. If you simply admit that "yes it's overly cluttered but it's what I wanted" people will respect that answer a whole lot more than a bunch of excuses that don't hold water when you look at them logically.
Many people here are very critical (myself included) about what they consider poor designs, so arguing that it isn't so poor is a futile exercise. Again this is just my opinion, but if it looks really bad then no amount of functionality can justify it. I know a lot of other people feel the same way.
For the record I am NOT purposely using this panel as an example, but rather the debate over it's layout. I very much dislike singleing out panels, but sometimes it's necessary to make a point. I hope no one takes this personally, I've just seen some hostility regarding this topic elsewhere (again) and I thought this would be a good place to address it.
I also don't think that "you don't have a cab so your opinion doesn't count" is a valid argument either. For example, if I didn't own any clothes I would still have enough sense to know that a man wearing checks and stripes is badly dressed. And I wouldn't say it because I was jealous, I would say it because he looks even more silly in his outfit than I do naked. (please refrain from jokes on this one

) Of course when they give you advice on how to "fix" it then that may be another story, but I won't go there.
Sorry to get OT....
Regarding the article I expressed similar feelings about the "wrong choice for a prime example" and "lack of mentioning byoac" to saint as soon as I saw it. I'm glad that I'm not the only one that was somewhat offended by the article and others like it.
