Hi, I'm using a vertically mounted WG19K4675 (
manual PDF) arcade monitor w/AVGA card in DOS using well... dos mame.
I'm having trouble finding a sweet spot where both the lower res games and the presumably higher res games don't "roll". i.e. if I lock in one steady (say pacman), the other one (say... 19XX ) will scroll and vice versa. Sorry I haven't made note of which res mame is auto picking...
To give another example, the original POST/bios screen rolls... but the ECSD screen and DOS prompt are stable able.
Here's a
previous thread from old ultimarc msg board with similiar issue.
Andy replied to the thread and said, " Some of the resolutions are 50 Hz and some 60 Hz. It should be possible to find a setting of the vertical hold which locks on all resolutions."
apparently
1spoon still had issues it seems and I wonder if either he or the original poster worked it out, and if so.. how? Also found a thread on the new ultimarc board
by 1spoon but still not sure how it worked out for 'em...
Did those guys eventually find a sweet spot? Are there monitors that are less forgiving (mines 20 years old!) or parts that could fail that would lessen it's ability to cope with variences in vertical hold or what have you?
Instead of futzing with that vert hold pot endlessly, my other idea was to lock it down for a common resolution... and then use AdvanceMame and ADVV to tweak the resolutions that mame chooses to make the monitor stable/semi-centered/happy =P That's a bit of a pain but doable... I'd like to try some of the .ini file stuff that garv(?) has figured out using the avgares utilities, BUT that requires loading windows in order to configure it (even if you end up just copying/batch filing in the .ini files to be used by DOS mame... in DOS ... later) Is there a download of a "good" advancemame.rc or other configs/tweaks/settings?
*shrug*
Thanks!
Rampy
---
I orginally posted this
on the ultimarc board but was hoping to broaden the audience for more input (plus i know that not ever monitor guru here is a regular over there) --> thanks in advance for any replies/insight (either here or there)