I don't agree with all the ---Cleveland steamer--- talking about the Eagles and Mcnabb T.O has done but he is worth the new contract.
Pre-T.O.:
Eagles go deep into the playoffs, almost making it to the Super Bowl
Post-T.O.:
Eagles have essentially the same cast of characters and hope that adding T.O. will get them to the Super Bowl. T.O. breaks his ass and isn't available. Team still makes it into the playoffs, which would have happened even if T.O. wasn't an Eagle.
Assessment so far: T.O. was a nice addition, another weapon for McNabb.
Eagles do not have T.O. for the playoffs. Eagles win, win, win, win....Eagles make it to the Super Bowl.
WITHOUT T.O.
Follow so far? They made it to the Super Bowl WITH OUT the person they thought would improve their team enough to get that far.
Assessment so far: T.O. didn't do JACK to help them through the playoffs and into the Super Bowl.
Super Bowl: T.O. plays. T.O. has a monster day. Somehow, T.O. DOES NOT figure out how to pass to HIMSELF, making the person passing to him AS VALUABLE as T.O. Result? I think we all saw it.
So did T.O. accomplish the results he was signed for? You're SILLY if you believe he did.
Assessment so far: No appreciable improvement based on his proficiency.
It's IDIOCY to think that the man DID NOT get paid well for what he DIDN'T do for the Eagles. Your story is starting to change with more information. The Eagles, considering WHY they brought T.O. onboard, were smart NOT to give that ass hat more money based on the results with him. They were NOT smart to dismiss his apology, and to allow this to go on for as long as it did. The first time he popped off after his holdout should have been when he was suspended. That's the ONLY mistake the Eagles made.
Funny that the Eagles aren't doing as well at the same time McNabb continues to play through injuries and "putting his career at risk". Funny that T.O. (does that stand for T.O.mmy too?) can't get his head around the fact that AS A TEAM the Eagles took that next step WITHOUT T.O. and demonstrated his worth to be exactly what he agreed to sign for.
Being "within his rights" to ask for more money isn't the same as demonstrating WHY he deserves more money and backing up your argument that the EAGLES are at fault, and NOT T.O. You see how the Eagles are "within their rights" to not pay the man, and I've demonstrated why they're RIGHT for choosing not to do so.
If you're gonna debate, at least do better than "well, because he can". Telling us how T.O. should have gone at this situation to strengthen his position AGREES with T.O. being the one who's wrong, just for different reasons.
