Howard I wasn't attacking you. Sorry if I gave that impression. It was not my intention. Rather, I thought that everyone out there would benefit from seeing the actual US code.
The part I directed towards you was prompted by my feeling that you were too emphatic with your analysis of the state of the law. Though, I must admit, I largely agree with you (especially rgarding our forefathers roling in their graves over the shape of the legal system), just no point in affirmatively stating something that hasn't come to pass. With regard to the dmca and "fair use" I think, though admittedly its been a while since a read the case law on this, that the ruling was based on a very narrow ruling of "fair use" which states that the use is limited to "criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research." I also believe the ruling put a lot of weight into the loss of market value of the infringed product and the fact that entire works were being copied.