Main > Everything Else
Lost: 380 tons of high explosives - Last seen in Iraq
mr.Curmudgeon:
--- Quote from: TA Pilot on October 28, 2004, 04:12:31 pm ---No no no no no.
--- End quote ---
Even though it's the "Internets", do you still cover your ears when act like this?
Also,
--- Quote ---It may even be possible that the Bush team struck a deal with Iraqis to move the munitions and were scammed (think Chalabi).
Ok - you've moved to fantasy...
--- End quote ---
Fantasy? Yeah, I guess it's kinda' silly. It's almost like suggesting that our government funded, and then the C.I.A. trained, Bin Laden and his crew. Unpossible!
TA Pilot:
Even though it's the "Internets", do you still cover your ears when act like this?
Still dodging the questions?
Fantasy? Yeah, I guess it's kinda' silly. It's almost like suggesting that our government funded, and then the C.I.A. trained, Bin Laden and his crew. Unpossible!
Not even close to the same context - and inaccurate. Wow.
mr.Curmudgeon:
...while we had control of the facility.
First, where's your proof that we had "control" of the facility? The 101st admits to leaving it "unprotected." You haven't proven anything in your defense, and you are now falling back on "I asked you first!" Weak.
...if you cannot reasonable show how they could have moved all that tonnage under the eyes of US troops, you dont have a case against Bush
I gave you a possible scenario and you won't acknowledge it, you call it fantasy. Were we, or were we NOT betrayed by the now #1 terrorist, Bin Laden, in Afghanistan back in the 80's?
Why am I even asking you...you know this, but you'll avoid it.
You're beyond naive if you don't think it's even a *possibility* in Iraq, even when I point out that we were betrayed by Bush's #1 guy in Iraq, Chalabi, when it turned out he was an Iranian spy!!! I'm not saying Chalabi did it, just that there's proof from past events that our government has relied on completely untrustworthy people who committed egregious acts of betrayal. Don't write it off simply because you don't want to admit it.
We didn't have the troops to waste on a munitions dump this size, so why wouldn't it have been a possibility that we "outsourced" the job to Iraqis??
I didn't ask you to believe me, but you're a joke at this point if you can't acknowledge the possibility.
mr.Curmudgeon:
--- Quote from: TA Pilot on October 28, 2004, 04:32:20 pm ---
Not even close to the same context - and inaccurate. Wow.
--- End quote ---
You provide powerful evidence in support of your theory. Wow.
mr.Curmudgeon:
--- Quote from: TA Pilot on October 28, 2004, 04:32:20 pm ---Still dodging the questions?
--- End quote ---
Is this your response to everything? I addressed your question head on, you don't want to acknowledge my answer because it doesn't fit with the narrative in your head (ie: Bush=God!) so you ignore it. Move along then, why do you debate if you don't want to hear anything from the other side? Seems to me your all about bloviating.