The NEW Build Your Own Arcade Controls
Main => Software Forum => Topic started by: daywane on September 09, 2008, 10:28:07 pm
-
I run version 36 on 300 to 500 meg PC's
version 56 on 700 to 1 gig pc"s
78 on any thing stronger than a 1 gig CPU
just wondering what every one else is running
-
My gp2x handheld is running 035
My E6300 OC'd to 2.45ghz is running 127
-
MAME32 .120 on a 1.9 Ghz DualCore AMD with 2 Gigs of RAM.
-
Mame 0.36 on a 233mhz-550mhz. Fastmame 84 on a AMD Sempron 1.4ghz.
-
MAME32 .120 on a 1.9 Ghz DualCore AMD with 2 Gigs of RAM.
does Mame use the DualCore?
-
MAME32 .120 on a 1.9 Ghz DualCore AMD with 2 Gigs of RAM.
does Mame use the DualCore?
Yes, it can be split into two threads, one for the general emulation, and the other for GFX emulation/rendering. Each thread will run on different cores.
-
Mame .117 and FastMame .84 on a P4 2.0 512 sdram
-
Yes, it can be split into two threads, one for the general emulation, and the other for GFX emulation/rendering. Each thread will run on different cores.
How is this achieved? Is it automatic, or is there a setting somewhere?
I'm running .119 MAME (hacked for no nag screens and optimized for dual core AMD) <---- is mine already set to be split by doing the hack?
Just curious...
-
Yes, it can be split into two threads, one for the general emulation, and the other for GFX emulation/rendering. Each thread will run on different cores.
How is this achieved? Is it automatic, or is there a setting somewhere?
I'm running .119 MAME (hacked for no nag screens and optimized for dual core AMD) <---- is mine already set to be split by doing the hack?
Just curious...
In INI/Mame.ini, under "WINDOWS PERFORMANCE OPTIONS" set multithreading to 1.
EG
#
# WINDOWS PERFORMANCE OPTIONS
#
priority 0
multithreading 1
Is what it is in my Mame.ini file. (It is a selectable option in MAME32/UI from the user interface as well.)
-
Yeah, I had that enabled in my mame.ini file already. So I guess I'm good to go. ;D
Thanks!
P.S. - I'm running .119 on an AMD 4200+ dual core with 2GB RAM. Originally I ran it on an AMD 4000+ chip and it still ran smoothly. The extra +200 didn't really make any difference. Either way, everything runs great.