Main > Main Forum
Interesting article on making LCDs look like fuzzy CRTs
saint:
--- Quote from: genesim on May 05, 2009, 09:51:56 pm ---But someone took a shot at me by saying they would show up at more door threatening my family's safety. Learn the difference.
--- End quote ---
Post me the link to that please.
genesim:
Saint,
Kinda hard to do that when the post got deleted. I suggest you check your mail I have sent you at least 10 different messages with not one response.
But I can paraphrase accurately..it went like this.
Me and Cheffo had an all day war. Then when he couldn't keep up(and I admit that I taunted him after totally being provoked after I tried to call a complete and utter truce...try reading the original post if it is still around) because he said he was picking up his kids I replied back saying my kids were old enough to drive and collect paychecks...hence establishing age.
He got mad and posted again on another personal attack so I said for him to stop ignoring his kids by having meaningless arguements with me(which of course would mean he "lost"...but in reality we both "lost" on stupid meaningless debates...guilty as charged on my account).
He said if I talked about his wife(which I never did) or that I didn't stop being rude and talking about his kids(which I never did...er it was more advice oh parenting skills actually) then he would show up on my doorstep. Which is a blatant threat to me and my family.
Of course I got banned for threatening him(I think....because you never answered any of my messages to you)... back with saying that would be the last thing he ever did when acutually I wasn't the one that started it with the family.
Now in my defense I did call him Rainman on another discussion without knowing his kids were autistic...which of course I apologized for immediately.
So what happens in kind...Hoopz accuses me of going after his kids just like Cheffo constantly lies about things I never said and when I disprove, I get called names.
Instead of banning me, how about banning people that are telling lies. And of course banning people that are calling names, or banning people that threaten implied physical harm...or at the least stalking. Hell I could take the ban if people were actually banned equally. Nothing I did was any different then what other people were doing EXCEPT mine was done alot less.
--- Quote ---You know, this is an arcade forum. We're not talking human rights and the future of humanity here.
--- End quote ---
Depends on how you look at it. These blatant lies about Arcade representation threaten the very future of the preservation of the art. Different things matter to different people. Who are you or anyone else to judge at its base level. Though it is your board, and I guess you can cut out all opposing views to the whole. You of course have that freedom...to be unfair if you so choose.
BUT human rights is what I am talking about when it comes to other members threatening my home. Messageboard or not, there are criminal liabilities with such behavior.
As for me thinking someone is insane for disagreeing with me...uh when did I ever say that? Actually if you take the time to read what is written that has been said about ME because I disagreed.
I do not work that way and like with all them I can quote you direct examples. Wait...I have done that already. For some reason it just gets ignored.
I can't even get people to stop attacking me on the fact that I owned an Atari in its hey day. :laugh2: :laugh2: And thats not personal???
saint:
Get your last bits in folks, I'm locking this thread tomorrow. Nothing personal please.
genesim:
--- Quote ---One thing you have missed completely... is RAYS picture of the Bubbles,
and the explanations behind it. (which really blows your case all to hell)
--- End quote ---
BUBBLES??? What does that have to do with the Atari arguement? I will get to that when we can at least get the fundamentals correct. Many are struggling with that even. There is so much more I would love to present, but I am not even given a chance on the basics because of the constant clouds of personal attacks.
So if we cannot get passed the undeniable facts that are the Atari display not blending....then it is a lost cause.
--- Quote ---I recall my atari on my old POS tv looking pretty bad. Maybe not quite as bad as projected here..
--- End quote ---
Looking bad and completely rewriting history are two different things. That picture is pure fiction.
When you got Randy posting some of things that he said it is clear that he doesn't know what he is talking about on this case.
RF got better to the point of separating?? NTSC standards changed?? My 10 inch screen was the programmers desired intentions??
I am not calling Randy insane, ..because I don't feel that he is. But coming to those kind of conclusions make me wonder why others have not questioned it and still rail against me.
xxxxxx
Saint,
--- Quote ---Get your last bits in folks, I'm locking this thread tomorrow. Nothing personal please.
--- End quote ---
Well if you are locking it for personal attacks, then it isn't because of me. I never told anyone to STFU!
As for personal, I don't see how my response to you doesn't at least justify a retort.
This is not to be mean or any such thing. But if I see wrong, I am going to point it out. But I will say this. Tell me now, tell me in my email, tell me anywhere....
WHAT HAVE I DONE WRONG that others haven't done to me? Why am I specifically a target??? Is it because I have a different point of view and the MOB rules???
Tell me what to change and I will do that.
Xiaou2:
--- Quote ---BUBBLES??? What does that have to do with the Atari arguement?
--- End quote ---
You, the almighty seeker of Truths can not handle the very evidence presented that
slashes your arguments about Games designed around the Display that they were
destined to be viewed upon.
As far as I can remember, there wasnt much in the line of color bleeding on atari 2600,
as the pixel size they used was way too big. However, there were effects such as
washed out colors, and slight blurring... and some colors bleeding such as reds. These
are all common things that happen over a composite signal.
The effects shown are extreme worse case scenario... where the worst possible tv
would have been used. Being poor, we had such a tv.. and it was pretty damn awful...
just not as exaggerated as what is seen here.
Still, it does not really change the facts about arcade displays (and console games that
actually used normal sized pixels). Which is the point you seem to really want to address. And to which you are wrong, which is proven in such an event as Rays bubble picture & description... as well as hundreds of other similar arcade graphics.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version