Main > Main Forum
Looking at a thin panel lcd vs tube tv
Love5508:
Appreciate the responses, lots of helpful info here. I think I'll stick with the tube. 8)
xtravbx:
http://tvcalculator.com/
wp34:
--- Quote from: xtravbx on March 02, 2009, 11:26:44 pm ---http://tvcalculator.com/
--- End quote ---
Very nice. I like the image options. :cheers:
Blanka:
--- Quote from: xtravbx on March 02, 2009, 11:26:44 pm ---http://tvcalculator.com/
--- End quote ---
I miss the metric options, and the pixel pitch is never mentioned in pixels per square inch. Even Rednecks are calculating them in .xxx mm. So you cannot compare them to tech specs. I tried to show every panel available in one view.
Blanka:
I included even more available screens, mostly laptop and carputer options as well as the new gigantic Philips cinema aspect one (Galaga, Pac-Man and Donkey-Kong side by side, so triple-MAME please :) ).
I still have a gap between the 24 inch 16:9 and the 32 inch 16:9, and you can see that 16:10 is pretty dominant, even down to the tiny screens. The 21.3 inch vertical LCD is huge for vertical games, even compared to many large widescreens.
You can use the dotted lines to see how much is used of the screen when displaying another aspect ratio. You can see cinema-content still leaves much black on the 16:9 tv's.
The dot pitch goes from micro 0.095mm on carputer screens to 0.649 mm on the old HD-ready giants.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version