Main > Main Forum

In case you didn't know

<< < (2/2)

Cakemeister:
FYI both of you sound like Tranq/shorthair.

If you are him, be careful lest you get banned again.

In any case, I would not mention K-------a on this board. It specifically goes against Saint's wishes. Look at the link Cheffo posted.

superart:
edit

Sir Auros:
Wouldn't certain frontends like GameEx go against it, too? Doesn't GameEx have some network support? Can't it remove the nagscreens upon startup?

Personally, I think their objections to netplay are absurd. Attract the wrong kind of people, indeed.  ::)

SavannahLion:

--- Quote from: Sir Auros on January 16, 2008, 11:37:32 pm ---Personally, I think their objections to netplay are absurd. Attract the wrong kind of people, indeed.  ::)

--- End quote ---

Personally I think a number of MAME's development policies are absurd or border on absurd. But who am I to say? I'm neither a developer for MAME or a member of whatever committee or cabal makes decisions about MAME.

For instance, there are a couple of branching projects that I think MAME really should take up and are well within their asserted goal, but alas, it appears to be contrary to their policies?  :dizzy:

Whatever. Let MAME preen itself all they want. As long as they don't force their project into a closed source project, I'll remain happy.

CheffoJeffo:

--- Quote from: SavannahLion on January 17, 2008, 02:04:15 am ---Personally I think a number of MAME's development policies are absurd or border on absurd. But who am I to say?

--- End quote ---

Exactly right ... and by that I mean that I too disagree with the MAMEDevs from time to time, but it is their product, their butts and their time. And saint wants BYOAC to be friendly, so we are.

NOTE: I just reread this and, since it is not apparent from my phrasing, this is a reinforcement of SavannahLion's post, not a criticism.

* CheffoJeffo turns the bloody coffee maker on

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version