Author Topic: new spiderman 3 trailer bits of venom (Read 2642 times)

rlemmon · « **on:** April 12, 2007, 02:45:34 pm »

http://movie-list.com/s/spider-man3-trl3.html

Damn I cant wait to see this !

shardian · « **Reply #1 on:** April 12, 2007, 02:47:57 pm »

I've watched the new trailer several times already. I am also looking forward to it. Sam Raimi has done a n awesome job with the franchise.

I wonder what Bruce Campbell will be in this one?

ChadTower · « **Reply #2 on:** April 12, 2007, 02:48:20 pm »

*potential spoiler warning*

So, erm, how exactly does he get the symbiote without being kidnapped by the Beyonder? That would be a whole movie unto itself.

lokki · « **Reply #3 on:** April 12, 2007, 03:27:52 pm »

Not really sure how they do it in the movie. (anybody read the book)

But there are other versions of the origin of the symbiote.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venom_(comics)

In the cartoons JJ jr brings it from outer space

Quote

The symbiote appeared three episodes later at the beginning of the Alien Costume three-part saga. When John Jameson went to outer space to get an energy rock called Prometheum X, the symbiote was attached to it and followed Jameson back to Earth

ChadTower · « **Reply #4 on:** April 12, 2007, 03:37:00 pm »

That's the cartoon, though, and if they take a multiple hundred-million dollar movie and base it on the watered down version written for a 24 minute animated series... what a waste.

Of course, not that the "I pushed the wrong button" origin on Battleworld was all that thrilling, either.

I just hate it when they go fiddling around with well established character facts.

(yes, I just happen to have read the Secret Wars series again 2 weeks ago, all hail XBMC)

shardian · « **Reply #5 on:** April 12, 2007, 03:40:27 pm »

Quote from: ChadTower on April 12, 2007, 03:37:00 pm

That's the cartoon, though, and if they take a multiple hundred-million dollar movie and base it on the watered down version written for a 24 minute animated series... what a waste.

Of course, not that the "I pushed the wrong button" origin on Battleworld was all that thrilling, either. I just hate it when they go fiddling around with well established character facts.

(yes, I just happen to have read the Secret Wars series again 2 weeks ago, all hail XBMC)

If you'll remember, they already introduced the JJJ jr. character quite a bit as a setup in part 2.

ChadTower · « **Reply #6 on:** April 12, 2007, 03:49:57 pm »

Nyeh, I barely remember part 2. I watched it with Jack Daniels.

shmokes · « **Reply #7 on:** April 12, 2007, 05:51:31 pm »

Here's what I don't get. I understand why OsCorp guy went all schizo multiple personalities in the first movie. He got in that machine that made him really strong and quite nutso. But I never understood when Harry got home at the end of the movie and started hearing the same voices. That made no sense. Now this trailer shows him hearing and seeing things again, just like his dad did, and it makes no sense. He didn't do the crazy machine thing that made his dad crazy, so why is he crazy (and not just crazy, but crazy in exactly the same way as his father crazy).

ChadTower · « **Reply #8 on:** April 12, 2007, 10:45:47 pm »

Mental illness is hereditary. The accident didn't make him mentally ill, it just made him really strong. He was already mentally ill but they glazed over that in the movie.

SirPeale · « **Reply #9 on:** April 13, 2007, 08:31:42 am »

Quote from: ChadTower on April 12, 2007, 10:45:47 pm

Mental illness is hereditary. The accident didn't make him mentally ill, it just made him really strong. He was already mentally ill but they glazed over that in the movie.

Actually in the tests on rats (before he got the dose of green gas) Dr Stromm said that it produced several sideffects, including insanity.

ChadTower · « **Reply #10 on:** April 13, 2007, 08:46:20 am »

The son isn't insane. He's perfectly normal half the time... IIRC he's schizophrenic.

RayB · « **Reply #11 on:** April 13, 2007, 09:53:09 am »

I have a crazy feeling they're going to have the son create the symbiote and "give" it to Spidey anonymously. That's sounds very "hollywood plausible" to me.
;-)

danny_galaga · « **Reply #12 on:** April 13, 2007, 10:09:10 am »

the trailers do look awesome. but i havent yet seen the first two, and somehow i dont think ill get around to seeing them on dvd...

horseboy · « **Reply #13 on:** April 13, 2007, 10:11:26 am »

You should. They are pretty entertaining flicks.

shardian · « **Reply #14 on:** April 13, 2007, 10:21:31 am »

Spiderman I and II are the best comic book to movie translations to date. They are definitely worth the watch.

horseboy · « **Reply #15 on:** April 13, 2007, 10:23:44 am »

Apparently you missed Adam West as Batman.

shardian · « **Reply #16 on:** April 13, 2007, 10:45:31 am »

Quote from: horseboy on April 13, 2007, 10:23:44 am

Apparently you missed Adam West as Batman.

Ok, best SERIOUS translations. Of course I loved Batman the Movie.
"Hand down the shark repellent Batspray! "

shmokes · « **Reply #17 on:** April 13, 2007, 12:11:56 pm »

Yeah . . . I love Tim Burton's original Batman, and it might even be a more important movie since it kinda paved the way for every serious comic book movie since, and I loved Xmen I and II and Hellboy and Batman Begins. But the Spiderman movies are pretty ---smurfing--- great. They are probably the best of the lot.

shardian · « **Reply #18 on:** April 13, 2007, 12:35:31 pm »

Man, am I the only person in the world who did not like Batman Begins? The fight scenes were filmed so tightly you couldn't tell what was going on. People talk it up like it is the best movie ever. Nowhere near as good as the first Michael Keaton film. I'd go as far as ranking Batman Returns and Batman Forever above just for entertainment factor alone.

(As far as I'm concerned, Batman and Robin does not exist. I've nevere seen it and never will.)

rlemmon · « **Reply #19 on:** April 13, 2007, 04:02:32 pm »

I completely agree about batman begins . The fight scenes were so fast you couldn't see what was going on. Batman didn't really seem to be borderline psychotic like he should be It was more like he was just angry. It just didn't draw me in like the 89 one. It was kind of boring and didn't really seem to capture the spirit of batman from the comics.

shmokes · « **Reply #20 on:** April 13, 2007, 06:10:53 pm »

I liked it. It was better than every other Batman besides Tim Burton's original, including Tim Burton's follow up to the original.

sphetr2 · « **Reply #21 on:** April 13, 2007, 08:26:02 pm »

I thought Batman Begins was much better than the original...seemed more serious/less "comicky".

Back on topic, I absolutely cannot wait to see this movie. Do you actually know if venom will be in here for a significant part of the movie? I'm afraid that the whole movie will center on Spidey's conflict with the suit, and the last scene of the movie will show venom's creation (leading up to the sequel).

Ah, who cares. Venom is always cool.

AtomSmasher · « **Reply #22 on:** April 13, 2007, 10:40:08 pm »

Quote from: sphetr2 on April 13, 2007, 08:26:02 pm

I thought Batman Begins was much better than the original...seemed more serious/less "comicky".

Back on topic, I absolutely cannot wait to see this movie. Do you actually know if venom will be in here for a significant part of the movie? I'm afraid that the whole movie will center on Spidey's conflict with the suit, and the last scene of the movie will show venom's creation (leading up to the sequel).

Ah, who cares. Venom is always cool.

In the previews it looks like he has at least one significant fight with Venom.

danny_galaga · « **Reply #23 on:** April 14, 2007, 08:37:23 am »

Quote from: shardian on April 13, 2007, 10:21:31 am

Spiderman I and II are the best comic book to movie translations to date. They are definitely worth the watch.

ok, sold! ill get the dvds tommorrow and watch em back to back (",)

and yes, the michael keaton batman movie was freakin awesome! maybe that can be my guilty pleasure movie...

jfunk · « **Reply #24 on:** April 14, 2007, 03:56:13 pm »

In the 'Ultimate Spider-Man' comic, the suit comes from some genetic experiment.. I'm betting they use that...

danny_galaga · « **Reply #25 on:** April 15, 2007, 03:58:14 am »

Quote from: danny_galaga on April 14, 2007, 08:37:23 am

Quote from: shardian on April 13, 2007, 10:21:31 am
Spiderman I and II are the best comic book to movie translations to date. They are definitely worth the watch.

ok, sold! ill get the dvds tommorrow and watch em back to back (",)

and yes, the michael keaton batman movie was freakin awesome! maybe that can be my guilty pleasure movie...

ok, job done! bloody brilliant, even on my 51cm tv (",). did i see stan lee cameo in both of these? also, i couldnt help wonder that in real life peter parker would console himself by shagging the landlords daughter- i know i would

RayB · « **Reply #26 on:** April 15, 2007, 10:07:42 pm »

I just saw the theatre trailer now and, well, they basically showed the whole movie. i don't know if I need to see it anymore!


Main	Restorations	Software	Audio/Jukebox/MP3	Everything Else	Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements	Monitor/Video	GroovyMAME	Merit/JVL Touchscreen	Meet Up	Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing	Woodworking	Software Support Forums	Consoles	Project Arcade	Reviews
Automated Projects	Artwork	Frontend Support Forums	Pinball	Forum Discussion	Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board	controls.dat	Linux	Miscellaneous Arcade	Wiki Discussion	Old Archives
Lightguns	Arcade1Up	Try the site in https mode		Site News


Unread posts \| New Replies \| Recent posts \| Rules \| Chatroom \| Wiki \| File Repository \| RSS \| Submit news