Main > Main Forum

KeyWiz, *PAC, etc. - which is preferred?

<< < (3/3)

Texasmame:


[/quote]

"yes, it's all fully programmable, regardless of if you use a *PAC or *WIZ"

 :cheers:
[/quote]

KNEW that was coming!  ;)

Texasmame:
Why would one get a KeyWiz and not a GP-Wiz* or vice-versa.  Both are for MAME, correct?  So, what's the main difference?  I think I get the GP49 is for if you have a 49 way joy and want to be able to limit it to 4, 8, etc. with software but I don't get the other Key* and GP* differences. . .


Gettin' a bit confused,
John in TX

NoOne=NBA=:
The biggest difference between the two is that the iPac supports USB, and the iPac-4 has more inputs.
You can get around the lack of inputs issue by getting a GP-wiz to backup the KeyWiz, but I had to go with the iPac on my cab because the cab is Mac-based.

Fozzy The Bear:

--- Quote from: Texasmame on August 24, 2006, 09:03:41 pm ---Why would one get a KeyWiz and not a GP-Wiz* or vice-versa.  Both are for MAME, correct?  So, what's the main difference? 
--- End quote ---

The main difference is that KeyWiz emulates a keyboard, and GPWiz Emulates a Game Pad.  If your building a control pannel for Mame then you really need the KeyWiz.  But you can add a GPWiz as well if you want.

My vote goes to Randy's product simply because that's what I have most experience of, and because the Keywiz has never let me down.

Best Regards,
Julian (Fozzy The Bear)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version