Main > Main Forum
Ipac2 VS. Ipac4
RandyT:
--- Quote from: cholin on February 02, 2006, 04:23:59 pm ---Little harsh Randy?
--- End quote ---
Well, you are coming on like you know the ins and outs of these things and operating under false assumptions. No big deal, lots pf people do that. But when you call my work into question as part of these improper assumptions, in a public forum, you're likely to not get the same respect out of me I try to afford others. Tactful questions are more likely to get tactful responses.
--- Quote ---That is the thing about philosophies.... everyones got a different opinion, and since you make the product, yours counts... I get it. My philosophy is that if it's got the power, why not use it? I dont mean completely re-do anything, I just think that there should be 3 lines: optical; digital; and then the mix of both, which costs more, but less than both of the others put together....
--- End quote ---
So get on with it, man! And when your customers start complaining about backspin on your optical interface, jitter on your analog interface and missed or stuck keys on the rest, you might well find yourself with an entirely different philosophy. Until you get to the point where you have to make those kinds of design decisions, your "philosophy" is really more an opinion that really isn't based on an awful lot. You haven't even used the device you are telling me to pattern mine after :)
--- Quote ---
--- Quote ---Tell me, was there a reason for this question?
--- End quote ---
Obviously... Im personally doing alot of coding for microchips in C and I figured hey, maybe Randy knows what hes talking about!
--- End quote ---
Learn assembly. If you want maximum speed out of your work, you will need it. All GGG interfaces are coded in pure assembly for this reason. C (or heaven forbid BASIC) on microcontrollers is slower and less optimized for size.
--- Quote --- Wonder if he codes them himself or maybe he pays someone to do it for him, like alot of other companies do. So now how obvious was that? You think everyone codes their own chips? Doesnt happen that way.
--- End quote ---
Cholin, you have been around here long enough to at least have a clue what GGG does and my involvement with it. You post in threads where I talk about writing code. Did you forget or don't you read my posts? That question was like someone asking if you were homosexual after you know they have seen you with your wife and 2 kids (not that there's anything wrong with that)
Anyway, sorry I was rough on you. If you have any other personal questions, try email next time and I'll be happy to discuss things with you.
RandyT
brophog:
Who cares. His products work, and from what I can tell he provides a good service to his customers. I'm not sure why there has to be animosity on this board about either Randy's work.
Tiger-Heli:
--- Quote from: RandyT on February 02, 2006, 05:50:53 pm ---That question was like someone asking if you were homosexual after you know they have seen you with your wife and 2 kids (not that there's anything wrong with that)
--- End quote ---
I heard stories about stuff like that though, Jerry Springer Show, or sth. NTTIAWWT - Wait, there is something wrong with that, well . . .
Tiger-Heli:
--- Quote from: brophog on February 02, 2006, 06:25:49 pm ---I'm not sure why there has to be animosity on this board about either Randy's work.
--- End quote ---
Either Randy's???? (Am I the other one!) You mean there is animosity toward my work? (Wait a minute, I never work, I'm always on here. If people don't like it, I can just take my ball and go home - then again - I'd probably stick around regardless of what the community thinks.
Actually, I think you meant Randy or Andy's (www.ultimarc.com) work. (And I think I'll leave it at that - something about sleeping dogs comes to mind, but I not sure what it was . . .)
brophog:
It was actually typed that way and the forum fairies stole Andy's name.
Unless there are two Randy's......... :police:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version