Main > Main Forum
MAMEDev's pull auctions without MAME
VMJ Team:
That's why I'm wondering if Foley is still involved...me and that (I'll behave)...exchanged a few worded emails.
Chris:
--- Quote from: CyberPunk on June 07, 2005, 08:42:15 am ---I also work for an international lawfirm.
--- End quote ---
ChadTower:
I don't think you guys are looking far enough into what is going on here. They're not just pulling MAME roms and MAME itself, they're pulling anything that could be used to build a "MAME cab". That seems, at this point, to even include some legitimate products.
Now think this through. Why would they pull any product designed for use in a MAME cab?
VMJ Team:
I (and many other's) don't care what these guys have coming down the pipe. I was just informed that by them pulling legitimate auction items on a the "mame" trademark could be argued as a violation of any trademarks owned by the seller.
That is:
#1, their actions initiated and resulted in these items being pulled.
#2, they specifically mentioned their "mame" trademark in a correspondence that resulted in legitimate items being pulled.
VMJ Team:
The person reviewing this wanted to know when "mame" was first used in "commerce" by the mamedevs...anyone have any insight on this?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version