Main > Main Forum
Mach 3: Any hope it will work?
Tiger-Heli:
--- Quote from: Lilwolf on April 13, 2004, 02:22:00 pm ---damn you all!!!!
I'm trying to find out if the alt version of mame with mach 3 support is worth playing..
--- End quote ---
I'd like to know this also!!!
ErikRuud:
I am attempting to compile this patch into NoNameMAME 0.079u4.05.
I must have something set up wrong. I get the following error when trying to compile without the patch.
Linking noname.exe...
c:\mingw\bin\..\lib\gcc-lib\mingw32\3.2.3\..\..\..\..\mingw32\bin\ld.exe: cannot find -lz
make: *** [noname.exe] Error 1
I think that zlib is not setup correctly, but I am not sure what I need to do to fix it. I have managed to compile MAME before, but the directions from the Mach3/FireFox patch are a little different than the ones for regular MAME.
ErikRuud:
OK, I got past the -lz error and I can compile without the patch.
I had to modify the .patch file to reference noname.mak instead of mame.mak.
ErikRuud:
I'm stuck again.
I applied the patch and tried to compile the patched code.
I had a problem with the mpeg libs, but I copied them to the correct place and got past that.
Now I am getting this error:
$ make OS=win
Compiling src/vidhrdw/laserdsk.c...
cc1.exe: warnings being treated as errors
src/vidhrdw/laserdsk.c: In function `init_mpeg':
src/vidhrdw/laserdsk.c:256: warning: passing arg 2 of `load_frame_ptrs' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
src/vidhrdw/laserdsk.c: At top level:
src/vidhrdw/laserdsk.c:270: warning: declaration of `buffer' shadows a global de claration
src/vidhrdw/laserdsk.c:45: warning: shadowed declaration is here
src/vidhrdw/laserdsk.c:301: warning: declaration of `buffer' shadows a global de claration
src/vidhrdw/laserdsk.c:45: warning: shadowed declaration is here
src/vidhrdw/laserdsk.c:334: warning: declaration of `buffer' shadows a global de claration
src/vidhrdw/laserdsk.c:45: warning: shadowed declaration is here
c:\mingw\bin\make.exe: *** [obj/noname/vidhrdw/laserdsk.o] Error 1
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
I'll keep trying, but I am not really a C programmer so it could take a while.
SirPeale:
--- Quote from: jimmyjet on April 13, 2004, 03:27:22 pm ---Oh, and the mach3 razor is overpriced no matter how long it lasts.
--- End quote ---
For the shave that it gives, combined with the long-lasting blade, how can you say that? I've actually saved money by using these. I was using cheapies that gave me 3-4 shaves before becoming useless. Now I get three months of shaves before tossing.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version