| Main > Monitor/Video Forum |
| Monitors make me hate this whole thing. |
| << < (5/13) > >> |
| Guywiththegun:
Awesome link! I was looking for something like that. If you go to 24" 16x10, it seems to equal the height of a 21" though. Isn't a 24" monitor 16x10 rather than 16x9? |
| DNA Dan:
--- Quote from: Guywiththegun on May 19, 2011, 02:49:39 pm ---If you go to 24" 16x10, it seems to equal the height of a 21" though. Isn't a 24" monitor 16x10 rather than 16x9? --- End quote --- Depends on the make and model. I have seen 24" in both aspect ratios |
| newmanfamilyvlogs:
http://www.displaywars.com/24-inch-16x10-vs-21-inch-4x3 Yeah, a 16:10 24" will have a ~21" 4:3 space (0.94% smaller diagonal). |
| DNA Dan:
If you go this 16:10 route look for resolutions of 1920X1200 (as opposed to 1080). Here are the ones from Newegg. I don't know about lag on these larger LCDs, but something to keep in consideration before purchasing. Also the viewing angle. http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007617+600030619+600012349&QksAutoSuggestion=&ShowDeactivatedMark=False&Configurator=&IsNodeId=1&Subcategory=20&description=&Ntk=&CFG=&SpeTabStoreType=&srchInDesc= |
| Guywiththegun:
Why no 1080? Is there some kind of problem with it? I found an awesome deal for an Emachines 23 inch monitor ($100 after Staples coupon), but its 16.9. Using displaywars, a 21 inch 4:3 actually looks way bigger in comparison. Who knew that made such a difference? |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |