Build Your Own Arcade Controls Forum
Main => Everything Else => Topic started by: Ummon on May 19, 2009, 08:26:38 pm
-
I was in the checkout at the store, and I sort of noticed this girl come in, but she didn't have anything I was interested in. I noticed the guy in the line next to me behaving like I would when I do see an interesting female. Also, it seemed my (male) cashier was doing the same as this dude. I didn't turn around. I just watched them. After a bit, I tapped the guy on the shoulder and asked, "What did that female you were watching have?" He paused and then said, "...her hard nipples." Laughing, I said, "Ohhh. I didn't notice." I did get a chance before I was done to see this female and her apparently hard nipples. I guess they were. Um.
-
Why is it that the guys who don't notice things like erect nipples are the same guys who refer to women as "females" ?
:dunno
-
Here's one for ya, sailor.
(http://www.art-iceland.com/image-files/gay-pride-5-480.jpg)
-
We had one in the store tonight in short shorts, shrunken shirt, and stilettos.
Was with a rather dorky looking boyfriend.
Now I know how everyone else feels when they meet my wife.
:(
Your wife is rather dorky looking?
-
We had one in the store tonight in short shorts, shrunken shirt, and stilettos.
Was with a rather dorky looking boyfriend.
Now I know how everyone else feels when they meet my wife.
:(
Your wife is rather dorky looking?
you wear stilettos?
-
"What did that female you were watching have?"
Who the ---fudgesicle--- are you? Data? Who talks like that? LMAO. :laugh2:
-
(http://a7.vox.com/6a00ccff93dad8d75600d09e71107fbe2b-500pi)
-
We had one in the store tonight in short shorts, shrunken shirt, and stilettos.
Was with a rather dorky looking boyfriend.
Now I know how everyone else feels when they meet my wife.
:(
Hahahah.
Why is it that the guys who don't notice things like erect nipples are the same guys who refer to women as "females" ?
:dunno
Depends on the circumstance. They're girls or females. Rarely do I call them women. It's so....constraining a description.
"What did that female you were watching have?"
Who the ---fudgesicle--- are you? Data? Who talks like that? LMAO. :laugh2:
Hahn. See above.
-
Depends on the circumstance. They're girls or females. Rarely do I call them women. It's so....constraining a description.
Girls are females. Just sayin.
-
Depends on the circumstance. They're girls or females. Rarely do I call them. It's so.... in violation of the restraining orders.
fixt
-
Depends on the circumstance. They're girls or females. Rarely do I call them women. It's so....constraining a description.
Man that is just one of oddest statements I've ever read.
Based on the description I was hoping this thread was going to have a picture of a hot girl with bit boobies linked or something. If there is one thing I love - its big cans. So I must say I was disappointed and rather confused as to why this is even a thread........
-
Depends on the circumstance. They're girls or females. Rarely do I call them. It's so.... in violation of the restraining orders.
fixt
(http://rantsnraves.org/images/smilies/fromgunner/emot-iceburn.gif)
-
Ummon, I know that you're going for intellectual or enlightened, but you're only really achieving skeevy.
-
Why is it that the guys who don't notice things like erect nipples are the same guys who refer to women as "females" ?
:dunno
Depends on the circumstance. They're girls or females. Rarely do I call them women. It's so....constraining a description.
I'm a father -- the distinction between girls and women is pretty damned important and is liberating, not constraining.
You really do feel the need to go the extra mile to make people believe that you are a freak, don't you ?
-
(http://www.iconocast.com/B000000000000111/Y6/News1_4.jpg)
-
Depends on the circumstance. They're girls or females. Rarely do I call them. It's so.... in violation of the restraining orders.
fixt
Hahahahah. If only it were so!
Ummon, I know that you're going for intellectual or enlightened, but you're only really achieving skeevy.
I admit I was hinting at the lack of deep sensual substance in males in general. Mountainous hips and bodacious asses mean much more to look at, let alone fondle. I'll stop there. <smiles>
Why is it that the guys who don't notice things like erect nipples are the same guys who refer to women as "females" ?
:dunno
Depends on the circumstance. They're girls or females. Rarely do I call them women. It's so....constraining a description.
I'm a father -- the distinction between girls and women is pretty damned important and is liberating, not constraining.
You really do feel the need to go the extra mile to make people believe that you are a freak, don't you ?
I'm not trying. Really. Just comes natural. Then there are others (a select few, mainly consisting of females, interestingly) who think I'm ahead of my time, or wonderful, or something. Threads like this inherently call into question gender and cultural identity. YMMV. (God, did I just use that? HAHAHHAHAHAHA.)
By the way, I forgot, sometimes I call them ladies - though more from the perspective of an adolescent.
-
(http://www.iconocast.com/B000000000000111/Y6/News1_4.jpg)
Man, i wish i had those arms. The chest, not so much...
-
Skeevy
-
Skeevy
is "Skeevy" the new "Smurfy"?
-
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/skeevy
Think of the "off" guy who lives down the street whom you find out one day has been molesting children. And you say, "Not really surprised; he always seemed skeevy."
-
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/skeevy
Think of the "off" guy who lives down the street whom you find out one day has been molesting children. And you say, "Not really surprised; he always seemed skeevy."
wait, this is a guy?
(http://www.iconocast.com/B000000000000111/Y6/News1_4.jpg)
and he molests children?
what a smurf...
-
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/skeevy
Think of the "off" guy who lives down the street whom you find out one day has been molesting children. And you say, "Not really surprised; he always seemed skeevy."
Ssss. I find it interesting most males go out of their way to look at atrociously thin young ladies and porn consisting of them, especially asians. Would think males are inherently pedos, but in the closet. I find it amusing that when I mention preferences that are in stark contrast to this, that accusations of the kind above spring out. Freud is still useful.
By the way, here's an example of 'figure'. 'Before' or 'after'.
-
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/skeevy
Think of the "off" guy who lives down the street whom you find out one day has been molesting children. And you say, "Not really surprised; he always seemed skeevy."
Ssss. I find it interesting most males go out of their way to look at atrociously thin young ladies and porn consisting of them, especially asians. Would think males are inherently pedos, but in the closet. I find it amusing that when I mention preferences that are in stark contrast to this, that accusations of the kind above spring out. Freud is still useful.
By the way, here's an example of 'figure'. 'Before' or 'after'.
Actually, that ties in with my theory about why fashion models are so thin nowadays. I reckon it's because most fashion designers are gay men, and what would be the most aesthetically pleasing thing for them? Teenage boys. But a boy modelling womens clothing wouldn't really work, would it? The nearest to that then is a skinny woman. It used to be that thin women were actually considered UNATTRACTIVE and even unhealthy...
-
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/skeevy
Think of the "off" guy who lives down the street whom you find out one day has been molesting children. And you say, "Not really surprised; he always seemed skeevy."
Ssss. I find it interesting most males go out of their way to look at atrociously thin young ladies and porn consisting of them, especially asians. Would think males are inherently pedos, but in the closet. I find it amusing that when I mention preferences that are in stark contrast to this, that accusations of the kind above spring out. Freud is still useful.
By the way, here's an example of 'figure'. 'Before' or 'after'.
Ummon, what does your being a chubby chaser have to do with skeevy? You didn't mention your "preferences" until after I said you sound skeevy.
-
Actually, that ties in with my theory about why fashion models are so thin nowadays. I reckon it's because most fashion designers are gay men, and what would be the most aesthetically pleasing thing for them? Teenage boys. But a boy modelling womens clothing wouldn't really work, would it? The nearest to that then is a skinny woman. It used to be that thin women were actually considered UNATTRACTIVE and even unhealthy...
An added aspect is that males are seemingly coming out of the closet in that they like girls that look like boys. Or maybe they're just that suggestible.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/skeevy
Think of the "off" guy who lives down the street whom you find out one day has been molesting children. And you say, "Not really surprised; he always seemed skeevy."
Ssss. I find it interesting most males go out of their way to look at atrociously thin young ladies and porn consisting of them, especially asians. Would think males are inherently pedos, but in the closet. I find it amusing that when I mention preferences that are in stark contrast to this, that accusations of the kind above spring out. Freud is still useful.
By the way, here's an example of 'figure'. 'Before' or 'after'.
Ummon, what does your being a chubby chaser have to do with skeevy? You didn't mention your "preferences" until after I said you sound skeevy.
It's possible you missed my post above about hips and ass.
-
Nope. In fact, your hips/ass post was a response to my skeevy post. You even quoted me. See below.
Ummon, I know that you're going for intellectual or enlightened, but you're only really achieving skeevy.
I admit I was hinting at the lack of deep sensual substance in males in general. Mountainous hips and bodacious asses mean much more to look at, let alone fondle. I'll stop there. <smiles>
-
Not that part of it, no. It was, I think rather obviously, a response to the first part of it.