Build Your Own Arcade Controls Forum

Main => Everything Else => Topic started by: CCM on September 02, 2008, 04:45:49 pm

Title: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: CCM on September 02, 2008, 04:45:49 pm
very interesting!


http://www.mmaweekly.com/absolutenm/templates/dailynews.asp?articleid=7012&zoneid=2
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: Ginsu Victim on September 02, 2008, 04:50:33 pm
I'm definitely getting that one. I already considered any Couture return as a PPV to get, but I want to see him punish Brock so badly.

Couture ain't getting any younger, but come on, he's so much better than Mir or Herring.

Also looking forward to this weekend's Chuck vs Rashad fight.

Thanks for the news!  :cheers:
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on September 02, 2008, 05:23:22 pm

Wait, what?  Lesnar isn't anywhere near ready for Couture.  And he's not anywhere near deserving of a title shot.  They have now officially gone pro wrestling.  They were always in a steel cage - now they just need to put on a roof and climb to the top.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: Ginsu Victim on September 02, 2008, 05:28:39 pm
Yeah, I was against them bringing Brock in in the first place. That's why I SOOOO want to see him get humiliated. Hopefully he won't be around long.

Though he man-handled Herring, his skills are LACKING!

What's next? Guest referee Mick Foley? Tables, ladders, chairs?
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: CCM on September 02, 2008, 05:42:08 pm
He may have man-handled Herring, but it was painfully obvious that he had no idea what to do on the ground.   He had Herring's back a bunch of times and never even tried a submission. 
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: Ginsu Victim on September 02, 2008, 05:48:13 pm
Yeah, that was my point. He roughed him up, and controlled him, but had no skills to finish him.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on September 02, 2008, 05:55:51 pm

Are you kidding me?  You know who else went the distance with Herring and couldn't finish him last year?  Antônio Rogério Nogueira, current UFC interim Heavyweight Champion.  That is the second time, BTW, Herring has lost to Nogueria by decision against one time getting tapped by him.  Herring also went ten straight minutes with Emelianenko before finally getting knocked out.  Herring is one of the world's very best at surviving against a dominating opponent and that's why they chose him to face Lesnar to begin with.  Herring's last five fights have all been decisions.

Lesnar didn't go for submissions because that isn't his game.  Why would he go out of his zone of expertise when what he knows was that dominating?  Herring didn't get in a single offensive move.

Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: Ginsu Victim on September 02, 2008, 05:58:49 pm
MMA is supposed to have well-rounded fighters these days. Brock needs to branch out from his wrestling background.
I mean, he managed an easy win, but too many fights like that, and it'll get boring.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on September 02, 2008, 06:06:24 pm
MMA is supposed to have well-rounded fighters these days. Brock needs to branch out from his wrestling background.
I mean, he managed an easy win, but too many fights like that, and it'll get boring.


He did branch out - with striking.  He knocked Herring down several times.  There are a lot of fans who find the wrestling just as interesting as the jiu jitsu.  Most submission work in MMA now is jiu jitsu and Lesnar just isn't built for it.  Jiu jitsu is about leverage against a larger opponent.  Who would Lesnar need that for?  What we're looking at is a guy absolutely perfectly made to be a ground and pound fighter - one like Randy Couture and Tito Ortiz.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: Ginsu Victim on September 02, 2008, 11:25:53 pm
His striking isn't great, but there's a lot of power behind it! He's still pretty green, but with the right training, he could fine-tuned into a monster. The Couture fight will be nice to see, though he's not deserving of such a bout yet.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: DJ Infinity on September 03, 2008, 01:47:39 am
Yeah, I was against them bringing Brock in in the first place. That's why I SOOOO want to see him get humiliated. Hopefully he won't be around long.

Though he man-handled Herring, his skills are LACKING!

What's next? Guest referee Mick Foley? Tables, ladders, chairs?

what do you call the Mir fight? that was humiltion IMHO. His skillz are lacking but damn I wouldn't wanna take a hit from Lesnar
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on September 03, 2008, 07:35:39 am
The Couture fight will be nice to see, though he's not deserving of such a bout yet.


I agree that he doesn't deserve a shot at Couture yet.  He still hasn't beaten a real top contender.  Herring is a great fighter but he isn't a title contender.  I just don't get how people can say Lesnar is so lacking, though.  He has very strong amateur wrestling credentials.  He won an NCAA Div 1 championship and lost in the finals the year before that (to Stephen Neal of the NE Patriots).
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: Ginsu Victim on September 03, 2008, 08:21:58 am
Oh, I never said his wrestling skills were lacking. He proved that in college, then cemented the fact by controlling Herring the way he did. I just meant that once he has control, he's kinda lost on where to go. He's obviously too big to be doing any sort of BJJ, but if he improves his ground and pound, he'll win by TKO for sure.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on September 03, 2008, 09:19:30 am
Oh, I never said his wrestling skills were lacking. He proved that in college, then cemented the fact by controlling Herring the way he did. I just meant that once he has control, he's kinda lost on where to go. He's obviously too big to be doing any sort of BJJ, but if he improves his ground and pound, he'll win by TKO for sure.


Emelianenko took 10 minutes to TKO Herring.  You have to consider that when assessing Lesnar's skills.  The very best in the world took 10 straight minutes (not two rounds)... so Lesnar shouldn't have been able to pound him out.  You're taking credit away from Lesnar for not being able to do something most cannot do and giving no credit to Herring for being able to do what most cannot do.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: shardian on September 03, 2008, 09:31:03 am
Your linky no worky.

Anyways, this does sound pretty interesting. Much more interesting than Kimbo Vs. Shamrock.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on September 03, 2008, 09:59:35 am
Your linky no worky.

Anyways, this does sound pretty interesting. Much more interesting than Kimbo Vs. Shamrock.


Shamrock will either tap the guy immediately or go to sleep immediately.  There won't be any waiting around on that one.  Shamrock is a fantastic draw and very promoter savvy... he learned quite a bit from Vince McMahon on how to fill arenas.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: shardian on September 03, 2008, 10:14:20 am
Your linky no worky.

Anyways, this does sound pretty interesting. Much more interesting than Kimbo Vs. Shamrock.


Shamrock will either tap the guy immediately or go to sleep immediately.  There won't be any waiting around on that one.  Shamrock is a fantastic draw and very promoter savvy... he learned quite a bit from Vince McMahon on how to fill arenas.

I loved Shamrock back in his heyday. After seeing his head turned into raw hamburger by Tito Ortiz, I just can't watch him fight anymore - it's embarassing. Kimbo will without a doubt knock him out.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on September 03, 2008, 10:18:42 am
I loved Shamrock back in his heyday. After seeing his head turned into raw hamburger by Tito Ortiz, I just can't watch him fight anymore - it's embarassing. Kimbo will without a doubt knock him out.


Depends on how fast Shamrock can get him to the ground.  Ortiz is a ground and pound master which pretty much nullifies Shamrock's best skills.  Kimbo has not proven he can do a single thing on the ground - he may have gotten tapped by a total jobber in his last fight - and if Shamrock can get him off his feet Kimbo has no chance.

Of course, Shamrock could be doing what Abbott did - taking a nice fat check to put Kimbo over on national TV.  Kimbo's network appeal is worth more to the sport than the integrity of that particular promotion.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: Ginsu Victim on September 03, 2008, 10:25:20 am
Your linky no worky.

Anyways, this does sound pretty interesting. Much more interesting than Kimbo Vs. Shamrock.


Shamrock will either tap the guy immediately or go to sleep immediately.  There won't be any waiting around on that one.  Shamrock is a fantastic draw and very promoter savvy... he learned quite a bit from Vince McMahon on how to fill arenas.

Luckily, he was around Vince when the WWF was at its peak. The late 90s was best time professional wrestling has ever seen, when there was true competition with WCW (I loved ECW, but it was never a threat to either of them...they just had all their talent stolen). You'd hope Shamrock maybe picked up a few tips. Hell, the Ken / Tito feud was as hyped as anything I'd seen in pro wrestling.

Speaking of which, man I miss the real ECW....
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: Ginsu Victim on September 03, 2008, 10:28:34 am
I loved Shamrock back in his heyday. After seeing his head turned into raw hamburger by Tito Ortiz, I just can't watch him fight anymore - it's embarassing. Kimbo will without a doubt knock him out.


Depends on how fast Shamrock can get him to the ground.  Ortiz is a ground and pound master which pretty much nullifies Shamrock's best skills.  Kimbo has not proven he can do a single thing on the ground - he may have gotten tapped by a total jobber in his last fight - and if Shamrock can get him off his feet Kimbo has no chance.

Of course, Shamrock could be doing what Abbott did - taking a nice fat check to put Kimbo over on national TV.  Kimbo's network appeal is worth more to the sport than the integrity of that particular promotion.

I'm fine with guys losing because they don't have the skills or experience, but I really don't want guys doing jobs in MMA. However, just like boxing, it's never going to stay free of corruption. Taking a dive is pretty much the same as being a jobber.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on September 03, 2008, 10:37:30 am

Kimbo will win even if it has to be questionable again.  They had to actually save him in the last fight - that stoppage was terrible.  Kimbo spent the whole fight getting rolled around by a nobody and was going to lose the decision until the ref called that weak TKO.  Shamrock is either going in to job or he's going to rip Kimbo's foot off at the ankle.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: Ginsu Victim on September 03, 2008, 10:48:56 am
I've never even seen Kimbo fight. I get so tired of hearing these people online go on about him like he's the best thing ever, but when true MMA fans who know what they're talking about mention him, it's usually as a joke.

Ken Shamrock has a lot of pride, so I hope money isn't enough for him to swallow it.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on September 03, 2008, 10:53:43 am
Ken Shamrock has a lot of pride, so I hope money isn't enough for him to swallow it.


I think taking that third Ortiz fight pretty much proved Shamrock is just making a living off of his rep now.  He has lost his last 5 fights, 6 of his last 7, and his one win since 2004 was over Kimo.  Slice is the bottom of the barrell for Shamrock - one last big check before he hits the end of his in ring career.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: Ginsu Victim on September 03, 2008, 11:06:26 am
Yeah, I guess he is just after a paycheck these days. Oh well, he had a good run. The sport has evolved, and a lot of guys from that era just couldn't keep up.
I've never liked Matt Hughes (especially after his TUF run), and seeing him beat Royce Gracie (not easily, though) still hurts to this day, so imagine how it felt seeing Ken continue to lose to Tito over and over.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: shardian on September 03, 2008, 11:15:07 am

I've never liked Matt Hughes (especially after his TUF run), and seeing him beat Royce Gracie (not easily, though) still hurts to this day, so imagine how it felt seeing Ken continue to lose to Tito over and over.

That's funny, because I could never stand Royce Gracie.  :P He tried to break the arm of almost every person he fought, and he used his gui as a choke weapon. I was soooo enjoying his final against Dan Severn up until that surprise ending. He did earn a bit of respect for that one, but I still enjoyed seeing him get worked over.

He was the mold that MMA has evolved from though.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on September 03, 2008, 11:17:24 am

Why was using the gi as a weapon a problem?  It was legal and is normal in many forms of grappling.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on November 17, 2008, 10:26:51 am

Guess nobody can argue that Lesnar doesn't belong now... Couture couldn't do a damn thing with him.  All he could do was control Lesnar while Lesnar was busy thinking.  As soon as Lesnar wanted out he was out.  Pretty much the only thing Couture did the whole fight was one pretty looking takedown that was more a product of Lesnar being tentative than it was of Couture driving through him.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: abrannan on November 17, 2008, 12:09:48 pm

Guess nobody can argue that Lesnar doesn't belong now...


You think that will stop them from arguing?  All I hear now is "The UFC fixed the fight for their new golden boy."  I don't think anything short of him beating Fedor in under 30 seconds in a non-UFC held fight will stop those folks from saying he doesn't belong.


Personally, I thought Lesnar looked damn good in the fight, and I'm looking forward to his next match.  I'd prefer Noguiera as his opponent, but if Mir manages to get through, it'll be good to show just how much Lesnar has improved.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: lordtodd75 on November 17, 2008, 12:41:50 pm
bad stoppage  ::)
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on November 17, 2008, 12:44:19 pm

Oooooookay... notice Couture didn't dispute it and it took him like 2 minutes to come back?
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: Twinpanther on November 17, 2008, 12:59:56 pm
To see Couture go down to a glancing blow behind the ear like that was pretty sad but seeing Lesner use Marios "Donkey Kong Hammer" technique to finish him off was priceless.  Honestly, I could almost see Marios Hammer in his hand as he pummeled Couture. 
(http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:Nyg2sW6mqa_HkM:http://pressthebuttons.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/mariohammer.jpg)

Bad stoppage?  Naw, it wasn't in the script.  /snicker
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on November 17, 2008, 01:09:24 pm

Yeah, I think this was as much the age limit of Couture as it was Lesnar's ascension.  He just didn't look like the same guy he once was and it looked like he knew it.  I wouldn't be surprised if White gave him Lesnar just to punish him for being so difficult lately.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: lordtodd75 on November 17, 2008, 01:27:45 pm
figures you would have something to say. couture was recovering, lesnar was slowing down. couture wasn't uncoscious. no reason to stop the fight. there was a moment about 5 seconds prior to the stoppage where I thought he was in danger of the stoppage. but he weathered that. It was a bad stoppage, plain and simple.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on November 17, 2008, 01:37:29 pm
figures you would have something to say. couture was recovering, lesnar was slowing down. couture wasn't uncoscious. no reason to stop the fight. there was a moment about 5 seconds prior to the stoppage where I thought he was in danger of the stoppage. but he weathered that. It was a bad stoppage, plain and simple.

You think that will stop them from arguing?  All I hear now is "The UFC fixed the fight for their new golden boy."  I don't think anything short of him beating Fedor in under 30 seconds in a non-UFC held fight will stop those folks from saying he doesn't belong.

 :applaud:
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: lordtodd75 on November 17, 2008, 01:45:46 pm
Yeah, that is a great quote. But it doesn't change the fact that it was a bad stoppage. I am not going to sit here and argue with you. Watch the fight again. If you cannot see that Mazigotti made a mistake then I suppose you are entitled to your opinion, even if it is wrong.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: shardian on November 17, 2008, 02:05:13 pm
That stoppage is in a grey area IMO. It looked like Couture slipped when he went down - it looked like he might have been going for a takedown attempt. He was making an effort to defend himself. How the ---fudgesicle--- do you actively defend 1" rabbit punches from hell?  :laugh2:

Another reason I think the ref might have stopped the fight was because the way Randy was trying to hold Lesnars arm, it made it appear that he might be tapping. In that case, better for the ref to error on the side of caution.

That was hardly a 'screw job'. If anything it still shows Lesnar has absolutley no idea what to do on the ground. He never attempted to gain any sort of positioning. It is subjectable how long a ref should allow a guy to be pummeled before making a judgement on his defensive position.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on November 17, 2008, 02:10:57 pm
He never attempted to gain any sort of positioning.


Lesnar secure Couture's right arm instantly and had a bulk of his weight controlling the torso from the side.  There was no way Couture was getting out of there.  You have to remember that's not just some guy underneath, that's Randy Couture.  A complete mount isn't going to happen.

If Lesnar weren't being so conservative he would have finished Couture in the first round when he had him nearly out on his feet.  At one point Couture's legs were complete jello after a clean shot to the head.  Dude may not have all the technique of the other guys but in three fights against the best in the world nobody has even come close to hurting Lesnar yet and he has spent almost all of his ring time in total control of his opponent.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: shardian on November 17, 2008, 02:23:20 pm
I just replayed it - Lesnar never secured Couture's right arm. He got on his knees beside him, draped an arm over his waist, and started face humping him with his fist (I refuse to call them punches no matter how much they might hurt).
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on November 17, 2008, 02:25:28 pm
I just replayed it - Lesnar never secured Couture's right arm. He got on his knees beside him, draped an arm over his waist, and started face humping him with his fist (I refuse to call them punches no matter how much they might hurt).


Can't see it from here but I would swear he was kneeling on the right arm.  He did it to him up against the cage earlier in the round, too, but it was the left arm.  That is one of Matt Hughes' favorite tactics.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: shardian on November 17, 2008, 02:36:52 pm
Since rabbit punches are illegal, I don't see why Couture didn't roll away from him. Force that big bastard to go for a mount!

Like I said before, I've never had a 280lb animal pounding on my face, so I have no clue how much damage those short punches were doing to Couture. I think it is safe to say that since Couture didn't make a move, they must have hurt alot worse than they looked.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ClubNinja on November 17, 2008, 03:08:19 pm
I had a friend in college who transfered in from Minnesota.  He wrestled (and was a big dude).  His favorite story was about the time he wrestled Brock Lesnar and had his ass handed to him very quickly.  This UFC win should add some new life to that guy's ass-beating story.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on November 17, 2008, 03:27:56 pm

As well as to Stephen Neal's... as if a couple Super Bowl rings aren't enough already.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: abrannan on November 17, 2008, 04:18:05 pm
figures you would have something to say. couture was recovering, lesnar was slowing down. couture wasn't uncoscious. no reason to stop the fight. there was a moment about 5 seconds prior to the stoppage where I thought he was in danger of the stoppage. but he weathered that. It was a bad stoppage, plain and simple.

At the point of the stoppage, Brock had his arm inside of Couture's and was dropping repeated elbows straight into Randy's face uncontested, and picking up Randy's head along with his arm between blows, so he was taking it front (elbow) and back (mat).  There's no way anybody could get enough leverage to scramble out of those blows before serious damage was done.  It was a good stoppage, and shouldn't have come a moment sooner than it did (Randy was still moving and defending himself pretty well up until that elbow slipped in). 

Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ClubNinja on November 17, 2008, 04:45:58 pm

As well as to Stephen Neal's... as if a couple Super Bowl rings aren't enough already.

The punchline of Neal's story is a little better, too.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: lordtodd75 on November 17, 2008, 05:21:58 pm
First, I am not sure I would call them elbows. Randy was holding onto Brocks arm and the force of brocks movement was lifting Randy off of the matt. If anything that makes the blows less effective because there is no real point of impact. The fact that you say the blows were uncontested is not really accurate either. Randys arms were moving around in a deliberate manner which is how he was able to grab onto brocks arm in the first place. Sure randy was hurt and dazed after getting pounded on by that monster. But he was clearly conscious and he was improving his position. The fact is that lesnar is inhumanly strong and it seems to me that the attempted strikes weren't damaging Randy as much as it seemed, they pushing him more then anything.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: CCM on November 17, 2008, 10:51:49 pm
I definitely have new respect for Lesnar.  The scary part is that he is just going to keep getting better.  In a few years nobody will be able to beat him. 




Guess nobody can argue that Lesnar doesn't belong now... Couture couldn't do a damn thing with him.  All he could do was control Lesnar while Lesnar was busy thinking.  As soon as Lesnar wanted out he was out.  Pretty much the only thing Couture did the whole fight was one pretty looking takedown that was more a product of Lesnar being tentative than it was of Couture driving through him.

I think Couture was doing fine until he got caught .  He bloodied Lesnar, was able to get up a few times when Lesnar had him down,  and I think Randy was the fresher of the two.  Not nearly as one sided as you make it out to be.



figures you would have something to say. couture was recovering, lesnar was slowing down. couture wasn't uncoscious. no reason to stop the fight. there was a moment about 5 seconds prior to the stoppage where I thought he was in danger of the stoppage. but he weathered that. It was a bad stoppage, plain and simple.

That's complete crap.  The first punch that knocked Randy down rocked him badly, then he got hit with a huge hammer fist clean to the face.   Couture was doing nothing to improve his position or stop the punches/elbows from Lesnar.  It was a good stoppage.  After the ref stopped it Randy actually fell down again when trying to get up.  Randy was hurt, plain and simple.  I'm a huge Randy Couture fan and wanted him to win, but you can't dispute that stoppage.


I just replayed it - Lesnar never secured Couture's right arm. He got on his knees beside him, draped an arm over his waist, and started face humping him with his fist (I refuse to call them punches no matter how much they might hurt).


Can't see it from here but I would swear he was kneeling on the right arm.  He did it to him up against the cage earlier in the round, too, but it was the left arm.  That is one of Matt Hughes' favorite tactics.


Nope, never controlled Randy's right arm....


At one point Couture's legs were complete jello after a clean shot to the head. 

Yea, that wasn't much of anything, Randy got wobbly, took Brock to the fence and recovered quickly... 
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: CCM on November 18, 2008, 09:41:52 am

Are you kidding me?  You know who else went the distance with Herring and couldn't finish him last year?  Antônio Rogério Nogueira, current UFC interim Heavyweight Champion. 


I always get them confused too, but Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira is the current interim UFC heavyweight champ, not Rogerio.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: Ginsu Victim on November 18, 2008, 09:43:03 am
I finally watched this fight last night. Even with Randy trying to defend, he was still taking a lot of unanswered blows, his head started bouncing off the mat, then the ref did his job exactly as he should. Randy was hurt and Brock was all over him.

Not how I wanted it to end, and I think Brock is a cocky ---tallywhacker---, but I can't disagree with the stoppage and I have a little more respect for the guy in-ring.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: havic626 on November 19, 2008, 06:45:21 pm

Are you kidding me?  You know who else went the distance with Herring and couldn't finish him last year?  Antônio Rogério Nogueira, current UFC interim Heavyweight Champion. 


I always get them confused too, but Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira is the current interim UFC heavyweight champ, not Rogerio.
YOU KNOW THOSE BRAZILIANS LOOK ALL ALIKE!!!  j/k i know there brothers.....plz dont flame my azz for that joke.
Title: Re: Couture vs. Lesnar
Post by: ChadTower on November 19, 2008, 09:22:50 pm
YOU KNOW THOSE BRAZILIANS LOOK ALL ALIKE!!!  j/k i know there brothers.....plz dont flame my azz for that joke.


Twins... that's why everyone mixes them up.