Build Your Own Arcade Controls Forum

Main => Software Forum => Topic started by: SGT on October 22, 2007, 09:52:35 pm

Title: Gorf much slower on Mame 0120 than 0119?
Post by: SGT on October 22, 2007, 09:52:35 pm
Can anyone who is using Mame 0120 run Gorf and press F11 to see what percentage you're getting with autoframeskip turned off?

With 0119 I got 100% with a P4 3.2 Ghz, 2GB Ram, ATI Radeon 7000.
With 0120 I can only get 75%.

I thought maybe I had goofed with the compiling so I downloaded the binary and put it into a new folder, but still only get 75%.  Anyone else having a problem, or does 0120 not like my crappy video card.  I checked again on 0119 and it still runs great.

EDIT:
Slow (75%) with 119u1 also.
Title: Re: Gorf much slower on Mame 0120 than 0119?
Post by: jaquer on October 23, 2007, 12:53:16 am
I'm getting 80% on an AMD Athlon 64, 1GB RAM. It goes up to 100% if I turn off the bezel.
Title: Re: Gorf much slower on Mame 0120 than 0119?
Post by: SGT on October 23, 2007, 08:57:14 am
Thanks.  Were you getting 100% with the bezel on with 0119 or earlier?  I'm not using any artwork.  Can anyone else with other types of CPUS  give it a shot? 


EDIT:
Removed the ATI Radeon 7000 and now I'm back to 100% with integrated video.  Looks like its time to order a video card.
Title: Re: Gorf much slower on Mame 0120 than 0119?
Post by: FrizzleFried on October 23, 2007, 09:59:21 am
Thanks.  Were you getting 100% with the bezel on with 0119 or earlier?  I'm not using any artwork.  Can anyone else with other types of CPUS  give it a shot? 


EDIT:
Removed the ATI Radeon 7000 and now I'm back to 100% with integrated video.  Looks like its time to order a video card.

Gorf has always run like ass on MAME from my understanding (at least since .106 when I started on this hobby).  I've asked and the only response I ever get is that the game code is very sloppy and it's not a priority?!   I dunno... :dunno
Title: Re: Gorf much slower on Mame 0120 than 0119?
Post by: SonicSlammaster on October 23, 2007, 11:08:02 am
Tryed it on my crappy old machine, both versions run it fine but i havnt tryed it with artwork on.
Title: Re: Gorf much slower on Mame 0120 than 0119?
Post by: SGT on October 23, 2007, 11:17:50 am
I dunno... :dunno

Like i said, Gorf is running great now since I took out my ATI video card. 
Title: Re: Gorf much slower on Mame 0120 than 0119?
Post by: ahofle on October 23, 2007, 11:49:47 am
Gorf has always run like ass on MAME from my understanding (at least since .106 when I started on this hobby).  I've asked and the only response I ever get is that the game code is very sloppy and it's not a priority?!   I dunno... :dunno

It was actually fixed a few versions ago (I'm the one who submitted the bug).  It runs pretty well now AFAIK.
Title: Re: Gorf much slower on Mame 0120 than 0119?
Post by: Chris on October 23, 2007, 03:14:43 pm
I dunno... :dunno

Like i said, Gorf is running great now since I took out my ATI video card. 
I wonder if it was the card or the driver?  What integrated video do you have?
Title: Re: Gorf much slower on Mame 0120 than 0119?
Post by: csa3d on October 23, 2007, 03:25:40 pm
according to M.A.W.S., Gorf runs at 60.054442Hz

Could this have anything to do with the autoskipping options which are now mandatory in newer versions of MAME?  I thought I remember reading that you have to trick it into running a hair faster/slower then your set resolution.  Sounds goofy me saying it, I thought that sounded goofy when I first read it too!  Maybe I'm talking gibberish also.   :dunno

-csa