Build Your Own Arcade Controls Forum

Main => Software Forum => Topic started by: divemaster127 on December 13, 2005, 12:31:52 pm

Title: photoshop required for art files
Post by: divemaster127 on December 13, 2005, 12:31:52 pm
I have a question, I have some art files, for my sideart & cp, that came with some plans i purchased but these files are photoshop files, i do not have this program & used copies are going on ebay of photoshop 7 for 200.00 am i missing something here is there another way to open these files without photoshop
thanks
divemaster
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: WTB on December 13, 2005, 02:05:53 pm
I think that GIMP will open and edit .psd files. I think.

   -Matt
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: GGKoul on December 13, 2005, 02:31:22 pm
If you goto downloads.com you should be able to find some free apps to open that file.
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: Frosty on December 13, 2005, 03:41:16 pm
You can also download a free 30-day fully functional trial of Macromedia Fireworks, (http://www.macromedia.com/software/fireworks/?promoid=BINS) which is the next best thing to Photoshop.  It will fully import PSD files.
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: MYX on December 13, 2005, 04:44:58 pm
You can also download a trial of Photoshop CS2. Photoshop is one of the coolest programs in all the world (and Canada too).
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: elvis on December 13, 2005, 11:42:57 pm
Photoshop is a waste of money for casual users.

GIMP is free, and can do most things casual users need without having to shell out an arseload of cash for a program they'll be likely to use once or twice in their entire lives.  And yes, it will open pesky photoshop files like PSDs and the like:

Main website:
http://www.gimp.org/

Windows version download:
http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/

And for the love of god don't start a "Photoshop is better than sex" style thread.  Yes it's wonderful, yes it's the defacto standard for graphics professionals, blah blah.  It's still too expensive for someone who wants to open and print a single file and get on with their life, so nerr.
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: markrvp on December 14, 2005, 02:23:20 am
Could we compromise and say Photoshop is better than sex with yourself?  Not better than sex with a partner of the opposite sex, but better than self-gratification, surely.
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: mahuti on December 14, 2005, 10:03:48 am
Depends on how narcissistic you are, really... I'd say we should avoid the topic altogether. If we must discuss it, then, at a minimum, Photoshop is better than pity sex.
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: Howard_Casto on December 14, 2005, 07:15:20 pm
Actually I've found the gimp to be rather useless on all counts.  While it can open psd files, it doesn't support all the filters that photoshop does, so if the author of the file did anything fancy, it won't show up. 

I give all respect in the world to gimp users, but I've seen sample artwork done in gimp and similar aw done in photoshop and the differences are clear. 



Getting back to the "topic": 

I'd say photoshop is better than a dry hump with a fat chick, not because it sucks, but becuase I don't love photo manipulation THAT much.  ;)
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: Lilwolf on December 14, 2005, 08:02:12 pm
Having access to photoshop there is a HUGE difference.

Photoshop is AMAZING and does everything

and Gimp is AMAZING for free... pretty good program...

But if you have the money (or license from somewhere else) photoshop is the way to go.
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: elvis on December 14, 2005, 09:09:47 pm
Didn't I just ask two posts ago for this NOT to be a Photoshop vs The World thread?

See my discalimer about "I want to open a file, resize it and save it as a JPG and not spend $500 on commercial software for a single use" above.  Last I checked, not everyone was a professional graphic artist, or had that sort of money to waste.

*SIGH*
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: Howard_Casto on December 14, 2005, 09:44:14 pm
Didn't I just ask two posts ago for this NOT to be a Photoshop vs The World thread?

See my discalimer about "I want to open a file, resize it and save it as a JPG and not spend $500 on commercial software for a single use" above.
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: RayB on December 15, 2005, 12:11:20 am
How about if DiveMaster told us what format the art files are in. Then we can give a proper answer rather than debate.

Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: Bones on December 15, 2005, 12:14:09 am
Can somebody not convert these files to another format? I'll do it if the solution is as easy as this.
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: MYX on December 15, 2005, 03:17:52 pm
The issue here may be that Photoshop files generally contain layers. If it is out of a newer version of PS then it may contain adjustment layers and smart layers. I don't think that you can convert this. Just download the trial version and try to make it go.

I use it in my video work and go nuts when I do not have access to it. Too many good tools.

Heck there is always MS Paint.  ;)
Title: Re: photoshop required for art files
Post by: elvis on December 16, 2005, 01:15:39 am
And read what I said.  Gimp can't even open files properly half the time, so there is maybe a 50/50 chance this guyis going to be able to use gimp anyway.

As I said,  I've found gimp to be rather useless. 

Really?  I've never had a problem with it.

PEBCAK  :P