Build Your Own Arcade Controls Forum

Main => Everything Else => Topic started by: shmokes on January 21, 2005, 02:39:42 am

Title: shmokes critique
Post by: shmokes on January 21, 2005, 02:39:42 am: I just noticed that I'm coming up on my two year anniversary here and wanted to see who really knows me. ;)
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: Gunstar Hero on January 21, 2005, 03:24:30 am: Anyone who's that down on EA must be at least clever.
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: DrewKaree on January 21, 2005, 04:50:46 am: Hey, what's the deal with only being able to choose one answer?

I've had you pegged as the slightly retarded and irresponsible fat housecat since day 1. ;)

NOW LEMME VOTE THE RIGHT WAY! ;D
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: shmokes on January 21, 2005, 11:15:47 am: Quote from: DrewKaree on January 21, 2005, 04:50:46 am
Hey, what's the deal with only being able to choose one answer?

I've had you pegged as the slightly retarded and irresponsible fat housecat since day 1. ;)

NOW LEMME VOTE THE RIGHT WAY! ;D

Or maybe.....just maybe, the fact that I only let you choose one shows that I'm a cunning slightly retarded and irresponsible fat housecat....
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: Dartful Dodger on January 21, 2005, 11:24:51 am: Who's shmokes?
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: Goz on January 21, 2005, 01:10:58 pm: Quote from: Dartful Dodger on January 21, 2005, 11:24:51 am
Who's shmokes?

Someone who is obviously seeking our approval

;D
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: shmokes on January 21, 2005, 01:36:50 pm: What can I say...I'm fragile. ;)
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: mr.Curmudgeon on January 21, 2005, 03:40:43 pm: More passion!!! Less capitulation! ;)

mrC
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: Grasshopper on January 21, 2005, 03:57:32 pm: I'd say god, but then you wouldn't believe in yourself and I don't want to undermine your self confidence. ;D
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: shmokes on January 21, 2005, 04:09:21 pm: But if you don't say god I'm liable to strike you down or cast you out or something.
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: DrewKaree on January 21, 2005, 05:56:21 pm: Quote from: Gozur on January 21, 2005, 01:10:58 pm
Quote from: Dartful Dodger on January 21, 2005, 11:24:51 am
Who's shmokes?

Someone who is obviously seeking our approval

;D

Floyd10 Sr? Is that you? ;D

_{BTW, I need some cough medicine and some socks....can you hook a brother up?}
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: Mameotron on January 21, 2005, 06:55:12 pm: Hmmm, I think your results are skewed.... let me see the paper trail from your voting machine. ;)
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: Sephroth57 on January 21, 2005, 07:01:01 pm: i think the consensus is he's a retard =p
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: Gunstar Hero on January 21, 2005, 07:02:50 pm: Perhaps. ;)
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: shmokes on January 22, 2005, 02:44:05 am: Quote from: Sephroth57 on January 21, 2005, 07:01:01 pm
i think the consensus is he's a retard =p

HARDLY!!!!

Overwhelming majority, yes, but not quite a consensus...
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: fredster on January 22, 2005, 01:23:26 pm: Quote
Overwhelming majority, yes, but not quite a consensus...

And the difference is?
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: GGKoul on January 22, 2005, 02:46:54 pm: Quote from: shmokes on January 22, 2005, 02:44:05 am
Quote from: Sephroth57 on January 21, 2005, 07:01:01 pm
i think the consensus is he's a retard =p

HARDLY!!!!

Overwhelming majority, yes, but not quite a consensus...
I voted for that party!
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: shmokes on January 22, 2005, 04:09:32 pm: Quote from: fredster on January 22, 2005, 01:23:26 pm
Quote
Overwhelming majority, yes, but not quite a consensus...

And the difference is?

A consensus means that all sides come to a compromise which they all agree on. For example, in this case the whole group might get together and decide that I'm an idiot savant autistic, with an emphasis on the idiot part. Once all the compromise was hammered out and there was a conclusion that everyone agreed on there would be a consensus.
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: DrewKaree on April 22, 2005, 01:11:43 am: Hey, aren't you supposed to say
(http://members.aol.com/browrob549/emo/whacky084.gif)
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: Bones on April 22, 2005, 02:27:14 am: I wanted to click "gay" but there was no option.

Just jokes shmokes.

* Not that there is anything wrong with it.
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: tommy on April 22, 2005, 03:24:33 am: Your the greatest. ::) :angel:
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: Bones on April 22, 2005, 03:37:23 am: Quote from: tommy on April 22, 2005, 03:24:33 am
Your the greatest.
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: tommy on April 22, 2005, 05:40:03 am: Quote from: BrokenBones1 on April 22, 2005, 03:37:23 am
Quote from: tommy on April 22, 2005, 03:24:33 am
Your the greatest.
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: Stingray on April 22, 2005, 09:45:29 am: Quote from: tommy on April 22, 2005, 03:24:33 am
Your the greatest. ::) :angel:

This coming from someone who doesn't know the difference between "your" and "you're". ;)

-S
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: tommy on April 22, 2005, 06:05:25 pm: I think he just took a shot at me. :-*
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: shmokes on April 22, 2005, 06:12:27 pm: Hey....I didn't know this thread was back ;D

Sorry Bones. I thought about putting that as an option, but worried about what I might do if it got the most votes. I'm very susceptible to suggestion.
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: DrewKaree on April 22, 2005, 09:49:16 pm: Quote from: tommy on April 22, 2005, 06:05:25 pm
I think he just took a shot at me. :-*

If you have to have it 'splained for you, it's no biggie. To him it might be a shot, but in your version of reality, it'll be just a glancing blow ;D

shmokes, I felt it my duty since you went through all the trouble of finding/posting the link again to dredge it up and prove several people wrong....or right.....depending on how they're looking at it ;D

Hey, should this be in the Board Discussion Forum, since we're voting as a group on you, or should there be a "Rate a member" Forum created? ;D
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: shmokes on April 22, 2005, 11:40:14 pm: LOL, I wondered if you'd seen that thread. People are really riled up over there.

God, this thing was hard to find. I was doing searches for words like "Rate" and so on. In the end I just had to page through all my posts for about a 4 month period.
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: DrewKaree on April 23, 2005, 12:00:08 am: Why not just do an advanced search and specify yourself as the author?

I had to look for something like that, and I ended up surprising myself that I used the word I used for a search term so often!

I'd tell you that yours was the right way to do it, but...you know.....
Quote from: shmokes on April 22, 2005, 05:22:09 pm
we both maintain a near constant belief that the other one is pretty wrongheaded.

You should do it my way ;D

Like I helped learn Zakk once, that's not crazy or OCD, that's just right!
_{pssst, he's Canadian, so he needed a good learnin' anyway!}
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: GGKoul on April 23, 2005, 12:12:08 am: Quote from: shmokes on April 22, 2005, 11:40:14 pm
LOL, I wondered if you'd seen that thread. People are really riled up over there.

God, this thing was hard to find. I was doing searches for words like "Rate" and so on. In the end I just had to page through all my posts for about a 4 month period.

The Ginko is kicking in..
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: shmokes on April 23, 2005, 12:52:09 am: Quote from: DrewKaree on April 23, 2005, 12:00:08 am
Why not just do an advanced search and specify yourself as the author?

I did a search for shmokes as both the author and the search term, but it apparently only looks at the body and not subject headings so it didn't pull it up. I couldn't leave the search term line blank -- wouldn't let me. I ended up just going to my profile and showing all my posts and then paging through using the "find" function of firefox on each page to good effect.
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: tommy on April 23, 2005, 01:26:23 am: Quote from: Stingray on April 22, 2005, 09:45:29 am
Quote from: tommy on April 22, 2005, 03:24:33 am
Your the greatest.
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: monkeybomb on April 23, 2005, 08:59:02 am: Quote from: shmokes on April 22, 2005, 11:40:14 pm
People are really riled up over there.

All of us are not riled up. you and I disagree on a direction and agree on flavored toothpicks, but that's it.

-white supremesist shmokes critique
I was disapointed that smokes made light of our deliefs in the other thread. Although his entire statement was true about black people ruining arcades, I don't feel that he made a strong enough point of how they hurt society as a whole. Why did he stop at arcades? This was his chance to state all that is true.

The hooded wonders are dissapointed in shmokes, we vote "retarded" - another group we need to do away with.

(for those with a broken sarcasm detector - relax)
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: Bones on April 23, 2005, 10:13:37 am: Quote from: monkeybomb on April 23, 2005, 08:59:02 am
Quote from: shmokes on April 22, 2005, 11:40:14 pm
People are really riled up over there.
Title: Re: shmokes critique
Post by: Shape D. on April 25, 2005, 11:10:06 am: Quote from: monkeybomb on April 23, 2005, 08:59:02 am
Quote from: shmokes on April 22, 2005, 11:40:14 pm
People are really riled up over there.

-white supremesist shmokes critique
I was disapointed that smokes made light of our deliefs in the other thread. Although his entire statement was true about black people ruining arcades, I don't feel that he made a strong enough point of how they hurt society as a whole. Why did he stop at arcades? This was his chance to state all that is true.
Its a good thing I read that other thread first because this comment taken out of context doesn't look right.