Build Your Own Arcade Controls Forum

Software Support => GroovyMAME => Topic started by: m.andrade1 on February 17, 2016, 05:54:42 am

Title: CRT Emudriver 2.0 for Windows XP 32 ?
Post by: m.andrade1 on February 17, 2016, 05:54:42 am
Hello Guys
Just a doubt, I use today Crt_Emudriver 1.2b + HD4350 + Jpac + Win32 + Groovymame 0.161b, i´m very pleased with the results, i would like to know if will be any benefit, fearture or anything better (perfect emulation) that worth the upgrade to CRT_Emudriver 2.0.

Thanks
Marcos
Title: Re: CRT Emudriver 2.0 for Windows XP 32 ?
Post by: haynor666 on February 17, 2016, 09:11:47 am
Driver is still the same for XPx32/x64 but to use groovymame 169 and futher You should use tools 2.0.
Title: Re: CRT Emudriver 2.0 for Windows XP 32 ?
Post by: m.andrade1 on February 17, 2016, 10:46:15 am
Hello haynor666
Thanks a lot for you answer, do you know what changed on the newer version 0.169b >, graphics, sound, new graphics engine ? does it have somenthing to do with better perfect emulation ? I mean can you see any improvment on groovymame for example that already are very good.

Thanks
Marcos
Title: Re: CRT Emudriver 2.0 for Windows XP 32 ?
Post by: Calamity on February 17, 2016, 11:56:58 am
Hello haynor666
Thanks a lot for you answer, do you know what changed on the newer version 0.169b >, graphics, sound, new graphics engine ? does it have somenthing to do with better perfect emulation ? I mean can you see any improvment on groovymame for example that already are very good.

Thanks
Marcos

Basically the way that modelines are stored in Windows registry is slightly different since v0.169, to make it compatible with VMMaker 2.0. You could use older VMMaker with post-169 MAME but it's not recommeded.
Title: Re: CRT Emudriver 2.0 for Windows XP 32 ?
Post by: haynor666 on February 17, 2016, 04:46:54 pm
Hello haynor666
Thanks a lot for you answer, do you know what changed on the newer version 0.169b >, graphics, sound, new graphics engine ? does it have somenthing to do with better perfect emulation ? I mean can you see any improvment on groovymame for example that already are very good.

Thanks
Marcos

Plenty in my opinion and too much to wrote here.