Build Your Own Arcade Controls Forum

Main => Everything Else => Topic started by: DillonFoulds on March 26, 2011, 03:15:30 am

Title: Sucker Punch
Post by: DillonFoulds on March 26, 2011, 03:15:30 am
Me and some guy friends went to this movie for a bit of a guy's night out...

Can't wait to hear Danny tear into this POS flick. Not that I had high expectations for something with such a stellar title, but come ON!
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: garwil on March 26, 2011, 05:11:40 pm
Are there boobies in it though?
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: pointdablame on March 26, 2011, 05:12:59 pm
Are there boobies in it though?

It's PG-13 so ... no
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: danny_galaga on March 27, 2011, 01:03:46 am
Are there boobies in it though?

It's PG-13 so ... no

Well then, I may disappoint you Dillon...
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: SavannahLion on March 27, 2011, 04:00:09 am
So the Little Sisters are all grown up now?
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: hypernova on March 27, 2011, 11:46:42 am
Me and some guy friends went to this movie for a bit of a guy's night out...

Can't wait to hear Danny tear into this POS flick. Not that I had high expectations for something with such a stellar title, but come ON!

Has danny ever tore into any flick?
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: lilshawn on March 27, 2011, 11:51:01 am
Ugh... 1 out of 5 stars.

At least I got out of the house for a bit :dunno
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: DillonFoulds on March 27, 2011, 06:13:20 pm
The only decent part about the whole movie was maybe the one fight scene at the start, against the 3 samurai. Every other fight scene pretty much was a rehash of the same thing. I didn't expect much going into the movie with a name like sucker punch, but I think the only sucker punch involved was to my wallet. I was just kind of disappointed. I went in with low expectations, thinking maybe the movie could surprise me, but nothing. Every time the protagonist was about to put on a show, the movie cut into a parallelism that felt more like a cock-block than an actual decent fight scene. The acting didn't pull me in at all, either.

Oh, the steam-punk zombies perhaps could have turned a couple heads and got a few ooohs and aaahhhhs from a couple members here!

It was a solid 6/10 at best. Maybe if it shows up on netflix I'd watch it again, but I wouldn't ever pay tangible moneys to see it again!
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Xiaou2 on March 28, 2011, 03:14:56 am
This looked stupid from the commercials.  Another Horrible CGI movie with no/stupid plot, actors that probably cant do anything near "convincing" martial arts.  Of course, even if there was convincing arts.. why bother when its against a bunch of horrible looking CGI + dizzying camera pans?

 What I dont understand is why are you people paying to see this crap, and why are you wasting like 4hrs of your life partaking in it?

 If everyone stopped paying to see this crap, Maybe they would get a clue and make some good movies.  I know its a long shot, cause there are so few movies that are worthy these days... but hey, its worth a shot.  Plus... it will save you $12 + gas money + any other expenses.

 I know that as a kid in school, you probably want to see anything just to say you saw it..  but wake up, its not worth it.  Save it and put the money towards something known to be worthy.

 This movie is typical Zombie fodder. Aimed at the young audience with money burning in their pockets, trying for the popular angle, pure gimmick and nothing of quality to deliver.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Xiaou2 on March 28, 2011, 10:43:06 am
Damn those clouds. BRB.   :angry:
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Mikezilla on March 28, 2011, 11:42:54 am
The only decent part about the whole movie was maybe the one fight scene at the start, against the 3 samurai. Every other fight scene pretty much was a rehash of the same thing. I didn't expect much going into the movie with a name like sucker punch, but I think the only sucker punch involved was to my wallet. I was just kind of disappointed. I went in with low expectations, thinking maybe the movie could surprise me, but nothing. Every time the protagonist was about to put on a show, the movie cut into a parallelism that felt more like a cock-block than an actual decent fight scene. The acting didn't pull me in at all, either.

Oh, the steam-punk zombies perhaps could have turned a couple heads and got a few ooohs and aaahhhhs from a couple members here!

It was a solid 6/10 at best. Maybe if it shows up on netflix I'd watch it again, but I wouldn't ever pay tangible moneys to see it again!

Zack Snyder directed this (300,Watchmen, Dawn of the Dead) so everyone was expecting it to be semi-decent, but WB actually cut some of his budget for the new Superman flick, because this film did SO BAD. Same with that Owl movie... Im expecting the new superman to suck, which is a bummer, because I love superman as a character.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Mikezilla on March 28, 2011, 01:12:14 pm
I actually liked the owl movie.   ;D

Haha I never saw it, I want to though! I thought it looked cool.  :cheers:
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: SNAAKE on March 28, 2011, 02:23:57 pm
owl was very average and 3d was good. ok if you are like....10. personally I dont give a crap about cute talking birds trying to save their bird family or whatever. gtfo plz lol..


I mean c'mon they cant come up with a better theme/script?
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Malenko on March 28, 2011, 02:35:49 pm
What I dont understand is why are you people paying to see this crap, and why are you wasting like 4hrs of your life partaking in it?

First off, 4 Hours?
Sucker Punch (2011) - PG_13  109 min
You watching it twice?
I wont even bother to comment on your "omg the actors dont know karate!" comment.

I had planned to see this until they dropped the rating to PG-13. Its not that I wanted to see TITTAHS *shudder* but when its an alleged martial arts flick, you do wanna see some violence. Also, it sounds like you're reviewing this flick without having actually seen it, how do you know its fodder?

Im gonna go watch Scott Pilgrim again.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: SNAAKE on March 28, 2011, 03:45:55 pm
2hrs movie + 2hrs travel time

WIN?
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Mikezilla on March 28, 2011, 04:31:19 pm
2hrs movie + 2hrs travel time

WIN?

It takes an hour to get to a movie theatre? ???
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Samstag on March 28, 2011, 05:09:55 pm
2hrs movie + 2hrs travel time

WIN?

2 hour movie + 2 hour download?

My favorite theater is only about 5 miles away and costs $3.25 per ticket in the afternoon.  That's cheaper than blockbuster or pay-per-view around here.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: SNAAKE on March 28, 2011, 07:06:28 pm
2hrs movie + 2hrs travel time

WIN?

It takes an hour to get to a movie theatre? ???

take me 45 minutes to get to a nice theater around here. and I dont drive(yet). usually I pay for one and watch 2. its perfectly allowed too. says "no pass". basically you pay for 1 ticket and watch anything you want. $12.50 for 2(or more) is a good deal.

downloading doesnt take 2 hours. I could get R5 and dvdrips in less than 10 minutes. my internet is gangster like that :burgerking:

Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: gryhnd on March 28, 2011, 07:53:58 pm
Haven't seen the movie yet, but it was one I've been looking forward to for many months.

Anyway, just ran into this:

In Defense of ‘Sucker Punch’ – Uncovering the Method Behind Zack Snyder’s Madness (http://www.slashfilm.com/defense-sucker-punch-uncovering-method-zack-snyders-madness/)
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: DillonFoulds on March 28, 2011, 10:11:36 pm
What I dont understand is why are you people paying to see this crap, and why are you wasting like 4hrs of your life partaking in it?

As a group of 20-somethings, we guys went into the flick to be entertained, not educated. It's not that we went in expecting to see a movie and "woooaaahhhh" the entire time. We went into it looking for a couple hours of entertainment, and it provided our money's worth in follow-up conversation, as well as a night we can always reflect on. Besides, it seemed to spawn decent thread here, I'd say.

Not ripped off by the movie, we got what we paid for, and what we were expecting out of it. It could have been a better movie, yes, will I pay to see it again? No. I feel the overall experience was worth our money.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: SavannahLion on March 29, 2011, 02:59:43 am
Haven't seen the movie yet, but it was one I've been looking forward to for many months.

Anyway, just ran into this:

In Defense of ‘Sucker Punch’ – Uncovering the Method Behind Zack Snyder’s Madness (http://www.slashfilm.com/defense-sucker-punch-uncovering-method-zack-snyders-madness/)

Stopped reading when it mentioned PART II: FEMINISM FOR DUDES....

If it was possible, I want to see the movie even less now.

I dunno... I get that Alice in Wonderland (with Depp) vibe from it. I have that movie on DVD and no matter how many times I attempt to watch it, I can't make it past the first thirty or forty minutes of it. I get bored. I get up and go to the kitchen for a sandwich. I take a nice long ---steaming pile of meadow muffin--- on the loo. I look at pron on the internet. I return to the movie hoping it's already over.

I'm not sure what's missing but those movies simply don't grab my attention.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: shmokes on March 29, 2011, 04:35:39 am

. . . you're reviewing this flick without having actually seen it, how do you know its fodder?


This makes my skin crawl.  I refuse to believe that anybody actually lives their life this way.  I don't believe it's even possible, let alone that anyone would choose to do something so masochistic.  However, if I'm wrong and you're being sincere, here are a few concepts that you might want to familiarize yourself with:

- Deduction
- Extrapolation
- Evidence: trailers, reviews, word-of-mouth, track-record, marketing, basic plot (i.e. this is a movie about PG-13 sex kittens karate kicking and gunning their way out of the bad guy's clutches -- you know that much going in)
- Probabilities

Also, mortality . . . I know it's cliche, but time's valuable.  You only have so much of it.


Let me put this into terms that are easy to understand.  What if a random homeless guy asked you if you wanted to lick his back?  Would you do it?  Cos, like, how do you know it wouldn't be awesome?  Have you ever tried it?  How do you know that lava will burn you?  I mean, you've been burned by fire before.  And hot pans.  But maybe you should put your hand in lava just to be sure.  God knows you can't trust what other people tell you about it, or even your own instincts based on an entire life's worth of experiences.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Malenko on March 29, 2011, 07:37:42 am
:soapbox:

Awww shucks shmokes, that wall of text for me?. Heres what I was getting at:  Xouche2 reviews EVERYTHING, from ultimarc buttons(well all their products) to movies without having actually seen or used them; a point you seem to be glossing over. My post had little to do with the movie (which I have no interest in, hence the Scott Pilgrim remark) and more with how he can do so much reviewing with so little seeing/using.

kk thnx bai

PS:I know what your getting at, I feel I have to reply to that as well. There's nothing wrong with not going to see a movie because it gets bad reviews; its another thing to give it bad reviews because it got bad reviews and not have seen it.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: danny_galaga on March 29, 2011, 08:02:32 am
Me and some guy friends went to this movie for a bit of a guy's night out...

Can't wait to hear Danny tear into this POS flick. Not that I had high expectations for something with such a stellar title, but come ON!

Has danny ever tore into any flick?

Admittedly, not often  :D

http://forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php?topic=92455.0 (http://forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php?topic=92455.0)

http://forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php?topic=82396.0 (http://forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php?topic=82396.0)

I'm just too polite  ;D
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: gryhnd on March 29, 2011, 10:26:03 am
owl was very average and 3d was good. ok if you are like....10. personally I dont give a crap about cute talking birds trying to save their bird family or whatever. gtfo plz lol..


I mean c'mon they cant come up with a better theme/script?

You must not have be aware that it's based off of a series childrens books? I don't believe you were the intended audience  :dunno

I haven't seen it, but I wouldn't set my expectations to those of an adult or teen movie if I did. Just sayin'
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: SNAAKE on March 29, 2011, 10:53:19 am
I kinda knew that and watched anyway fully knowing it wasnt for me lol..

whatever :dunno





Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: ChadTower on March 29, 2011, 10:54:55 am

Are we really arguing over how to argue over ---smurfy--- movies?
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: gryhnd on March 29, 2011, 10:58:52 am
Are we really arguing over how to argue over ---smurfy--- movies?

+1 for hitting the nail on the head  ;D
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Xiaou2 on March 29, 2011, 01:33:56 pm
Quote
reviews EVERYTHING, from ultimarc buttons(well all their products) to movies without having actually seen or used them

Quote
- Deduction
- Extrapolation
- Evidence

 In fact, armed with good mechanical knowledge, ability, experience, ect, I have a much high percentage of being dead-on than to review a movie Ive never seen.

 Mechanics & Physics dont change.  If you understand them, and as long as you account for all the variables... you can know to a high degree of accuracy, the end output, without even laying a finger on the device.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: lilshawn on March 29, 2011, 02:50:28 pm
EVERYBODY HOLD ON! HERE WE GO!!!!.... :lol
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: shmokes on March 29, 2011, 03:28:57 pm
Xiaou, shouldn't you be incredibly wealthy by now?

Also, how could anybody see the previews for Owl and even entertain the possibility that it might be good?
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: ChadTower on March 29, 2011, 03:59:18 pm

He is incredibly wealthy when you measure wealth in awesomeness.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: shmokes on March 29, 2011, 04:19:43 pm
I had not considered that.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Mikezilla on March 29, 2011, 04:50:18 pm
Even if its self proclaimed?
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: ChadTower on March 30, 2011, 09:18:49 am

That's the most authentic kind.

NSFW language.

Spose - I'm Awesome (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYws8biwOYc#ws)
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Mikezilla on March 30, 2011, 01:13:19 pm
Damn. Im at work.  :'(
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: lilshawn on March 30, 2011, 01:27:28 pm
Damn. Im at work.  :'(

me too... now i can't wait until quittin' time!  :lol
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: clutch on March 30, 2011, 02:36:48 pm
Sucked a bunch.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Vigo on March 30, 2011, 02:39:09 pm
Also, how could anybody see the previews for Owl and even entertain the possibility that it might be good?

Well...it's obviously the compelling movie title they gave it...I mean, its not just about guardians, its about a legend of guardians, that's like double awesome. It WHO are these legendard guardians? They are fickin' owls man! Owls of Ga hoole! Hell yeah! These have to be like super-owls or something. Like laser beam hooting powers and super magic nocturnal mouse snatching skills. I bet they even know how many licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie roll pop.

OK...nevermind, I don't even know what would compel someone to watch even the previews, other than knowing Zack Snyder is directing....but I hear that the movie has zero zombie spartan owls.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: shmokes on March 30, 2011, 05:54:18 pm
But the thing is, even if the movie were a masterpiece, the previews made it look SOOOOOOOOOO awful.  Like OMG awful. 
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: hypernova on March 30, 2011, 06:10:15 pm
I bet they even know how many licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie roll pop.

I just did that a few weeks ago.  Some suckers were included in a shipment from one of our suppliers.  Took me about 25 minutes to suck the entire thing down to the stick, including the tootsie roll.  So...

I'm awesome!
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: pinballwizard79 on March 30, 2011, 06:48:14 pm
Machine guns + plaid skirt tight sweater wearing 19 year old catholic girls = what CGI?

Movie looks like fun to me, you know fun like "A-Team" or "Red". Something you watch on the big screen with the speakers up really loud & go "hahaha awesome, lol nu uh no way".

Word
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: RayB on March 31, 2011, 10:58:33 am
The owl movie is based on a long book series which is apparently quite good, so the movie is just a very condensed, barely similar imitation of that. I haven't read the books but was told by someone who has that A LOT is cut out, to the point where the movie is just boring. (---steaming pile of meadow muffin--- happens, go save owls. battle. happy ending. BORING!)
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: shmokes on March 31, 2011, 11:09:13 am
I don't think I'm making my position clear, lol.  Why would anybody voluntarily watch this movie after seeing this:

'Legend of the Guardians' Trailer HD (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8RKCmkOyB4#ws)



 :laugh2:


Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: SNAAKE on March 31, 2011, 01:13:22 pm
I didnt pay for it :dunno
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: pinballwizard79 on March 31, 2011, 06:47:32 pm
That does look like crap
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: shmokes on April 03, 2011, 11:22:05 am
Right?  It almost looks like it could be fake.  Like something The Onion had made.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: RayB on April 03, 2011, 10:58:39 pm
Sucker Punch = retarded

And after all the bad reviews, my buddy picked the IMAX showing! $16.75 for this horse manure!

The "battle" scenes were entertaining enough in a "random video-gamey cutscene" kind of way, but everything else was... weak.  Weak dialogue and weak acting from the women. Several parts of the movie felt like a music video. The lead actress can only manage three facial expressions: worried, stoic and a really subtle "happy". Her acting is on par with Paris Hilton's. 

I haven't felt this cheated since I went to see Coyote Ugly.   ;D

PS: Bjork? Really? I like the song, but boy was it jarring to have that come on that first time, especially considering the 1940's ambience that had been established by then.
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: Howard_Casto on April 04, 2011, 03:39:15 pm

That's the most authentic kind.

NSFW language.

Spose - I'm Awesome (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYws8biwOYc#ws)

No interest in the crappy movie discussion, but thanks for that Chad... that song is so me it hurts!
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: dre-w on April 04, 2011, 11:34:54 pm
owl was very average and 3d was good. ok if you are like....10. personally I dont give a crap about cute talking birds trying to save their bird family or whatever. gtfo plz lol..

I mean c'mon they cant come up with a better theme/script?

Isn't that basically the plot of District 9 as well?  Just uglier owls and more violence?

Just saying.


:laugh2:

 :cheers:
Title: Re: Sucker Punch
Post by: NightGod on April 11, 2011, 11:22:26 am

That's the most authentic kind.

NSFW language.

Spose - I'm Awesome (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYws8biwOYc#ws)
No, you're not, dude don't lie.