Main > Main Forum
** RAM Controls Reproduction Star Wars Flight Yoke Controller **
Hoopz:
--- Quote from: Deadly on February 05, 2010, 10:21:21 pm ---Out of all the people flaming on here - how many have actually ordered one? If you haven't then who the hell cares if Dave gets the yokes out? Seriously - someone please explain what entitles you to start flaming someone? Technically this whole thread goes against the rules. A bunch of childish BS over a stupid yoke? The fate of the world depends on the release of this yoke? C'mon and grow up. From this thread or KLOV not one person has said they asked Dave for a refund and didn't get it. Look - why don;t we leave this thread to the people whom have pre-paid. That's be what ... 2 or 3 people? Surely they and they alone are entitled to discuss their concerns.
Havok - you've been a "Saint" (no punn intended) about all of this.
David Adams you need to nut up.
--- End quote ---
Guess who started this thread that goes against the rules? The liar and thief. What's got your panties in a twist about it? As was said before when you were whining about having to read it here and at KLOV, if you don't like it, don't read it. People have a right to ask and a right to complain. Or do you think you have a right to tell people what they should think and right?
Troll.
And you owe WareWolF an apology. And his money back too.
FrizzleFried:
:laugh2:
...love ya Deadly...
:cheers:
smalltownguy:
--- Quote from: FrizzleFried on February 06, 2010, 09:02:51 am ---
--- End quote ---
That's quite possibly the funniest smiley I've ever seen. I'm SO stealing it.
ratzz:
--- Quote from: TPB on February 05, 2010, 07:05:52 pm ---
Ratzz,
There was no need to steer this thread (which Dave created) in that direction. I reckon an apology to Saint's in order.
Saint's impartially is demonstrated by the fact that he didn't edit or delete your post, despite your rude sentiment towards him. Saint was entitled to lend support to his friend Dave in 2007. But roll forward to 2010 and even Saint's patience is fraying, as he expressed earlier in this thread :
--- Quote from: saint on January 26, 2010, 02:27:37 pm ---
At this point silence is damning. I have high hopes but would like to hear something.
--- End quote ---
Saint,
I agree with your reading of the situation, which is consistent with my own. Let's face it, a "business venture going (gone?) south" is one with a cash flow problem :
--- Quote from: saint on February 05, 2010, 05:13:00 pm ---
My personal opinion (note the word personal, thanks) is that Shardian is probably closest to the mark and this is a business venture going (gone?) south, not an attempt at scamming. I still have hopes but little confidence.
--- End quote ---
... and I agree, it's not a scam, as people will probably end up receiving their yokes. It's not a scam, but a scheme to help him sort out his money issues.
Rattz and Saint, you guys need to share one of these - and Ratzz, it's your shout : :cheers:
--- End quote ---
Apologise for what exactly?
I voiced my opinion (correctly as it turns out in 2007).
Apparently, as long as Saint is right, and I “don’t kick him in the balls in his house”, then I should be ok to voice my opinion – well so long as I agree to Saints stance.
So I can’t disagree with anything Saint says? Why?
FYI, I sent a personal message to Saint about this issue last time it rose it’s ugly head, and I heard nothing back. I eluded to the fact that Saint thought Dave was a great guy and all the free $0.0001 stuff he gives away, does not makes him so.
Why is Saint such a Saint? On the home page of BYOAC there is one of those animated .gifs that says: “STOP INTERNET SENSORSHIP ... FREE SPEECH ONLINE ... BLUE RIBBON CAMPAIGN ...” – I asked him what that meant and he didn’t reply - but he was also wrong to back David and for maybe some of you to send your money to him.
And, PCB, FYI this is what you wrote to ME on the thread:
“Hi Simon,
Whilst I agree with you, don't waste your time ...
Suckers will never learn.
You'll only end up being the wrath of their vengeance.
They'll always be David's disciples (hey, 12 disciples, dozey dozen, uncanny coincidence ?).
Your attempts to drum "common sense" into them, will simply fall on deaf and confrontational ears.
Cheers,
TPB.”
To use one of Saint’s expressions ... My mind “boggles”!?!?!?
I was right about the Ram-Controls SW Yolk going tits-up and could see it coming, and so were others including FrizzleFried – what was unbelievable was how many of you didn’t.
I can certainly live without this forum. I know nobody personally, but have on occasion felt close to people who have guided me and helped me out and some who have not but I’ve appreciated their comments non-the-less.
Anyways, taking a break again may be a great idea – crack on guys.
CheffoJeffo:
--- Quote from: ratzz on February 06, 2010, 04:32:48 pm ---Apparently, as long as Saint is right, and I “don’t kick him in the balls in his house”, then I should be ok to voice my opinion – well so long as I agree to Saints stance.
So I can’t disagree with anything Saint says? Why?
--- End quote ---
It has nothing to do with disagreeing with saint's opinion on the subject at hand -- it has to do with you attacking his integrity regarding how he moderates.
One is your exercising freedom of speech, the other is being a dooshbag.
::)