Main > Everything Else
Avatar
Ginsu Victim:
Yeah, Coraline was never gimmicky. There were scenes that jumped out because it WAS 3-D, but they weren't used in a tacky way. The 3-D was all about depth of field, which they did a great job with.
Up was also very reserved in their use of it. It was all about depth.
Both films did a great job of avoiding abuse of the format.
shardian:
--- Quote from: Ginsu Victim on August 21, 2009, 09:42:32 am ---Yeah, Coraline was never gimmicky. There were scenes that jumped out because it WAS 3-D, but they weren't used in a tacky way. The 3-D was all about depth of field, which they did a great job with.
Up was also very reserved in their use of it. It was all about depth.
Both films did a great job of avoiding abuse of the format.
--- End quote ---
The one in Coraline that really jumped out at me was the introduction of the other-dad. He turned around and popped out 2 extender arms right at the camera. I thought it was cool, but it is still a 3D gimmick.
I'm biased though, because Muppets 3D and T2 3D are my favorite attractions at Disney World and Universal Studios, respectively.
Ginsu Victim:
The one I think about is the needle right at the beginning. I'd forgot about the arms.
Ginsu Victim:
--- Quote from: pinballjim on August 21, 2009, 10:35:02 am ---the first 30 seconds I was all, "wow, this looks amazing" and by the end of it I was groaning.
--- End quote ---
Wow, Jim and I agree on something.
shardian:
James Cameron should know better than anyone - well done physical effects trump well done CGI effects every time.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version