Main > Main Forum
Interesting article on making LCDs look like fuzzy CRTs
genesim:
UH no. I experienced it when it debuted. My father purchased it and actually shared it with me and him both proceded to play it for over 10 years along with my friends. Quite an assumption. Don't tell me what I did. You don't know, but I can tell you this, I too knew about the dissapointment of having the front covers not looking like what you got in the game....oh and for the record I also have one of the original catalogs that came with the game. But of course that must have been an illusion right? Something I just picked up later. :laugh2:
Second, the NTSC standard is just that. Doesn't change resolution my man. While TV's can be more crappy from one to the next, it doesn't change the fact that a said number of lines are being produced. That is why it is called a STANDARD.
Third...Atari 2600 whether hooked through RF, Antenna, the resolution doesn't suddenly change. You can't squeeze blood from a turnip.
--- Quote ---But on my very used $150 10" color TV, it most certainly did
--- End quote ---
WHOAAA there, so now you are telling me they they specifically designed the resolution for your TV?? :laugh2: :laugh2:
I was there, and I was playing it. Not 10 years after the fact like many on here claim that know better.
--- Quote ---You could tell it was supposed to be hair, but it certainly didn't have enough definition to see strands.
--- End quote ---
BULL. While it doesn't look like high definition, shall I dig it up my old televisions now? While the screen is interlaced, you cannot be serious.
Hair can most defintely be seen and it wasn't my eyes just finishing the rest. This is a weak part of your arguement and if noone steps up to blow the whistle then it shows that people just don't want to know what the truth is.
genesim:
Oh yeah and for the record I had the "clunk" "clunk" "clunk" as well....UHF and VHF(as I remember) was also a channel. There were all different kinds. Hmmmmm must be only you though right.
RandyT:
I see you dodged the question......how old were you?
genesim:
I don't like to tell my age. That isn't a dodge. Lets say I am 35 to 50 which puts me old enough.
By the way, your arguement kind of contradicts itself.
You say that your mind finishes the rest with hair....but it somehow blends the rest with the lines?
hmmmmm
So next are you going to say that my mind is different from everyone else's. :laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2:
I get it, I must not have the mindset to see the blurred image.
RandyT:
--- Quote from: genesim on May 05, 2009, 08:40:08 pm ---I don't like to tell my age. That isn't a dodge. Lets say I am 35 to 50 which puts me old enough.
--- End quote ---
Uh huh...and your reason for not divulging what might be a very important gauge as to the credibility of the experiences you constantly refer to in this debate is...?
--- Quote ---So next are you going to say that my mind is different from everyone else's. :laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2:
--- End quote ---
No, I'm not going to say it....