Main > Main Forum
CRT look and feel on a LCD
CheffoJeffo:
--- Quote from: genesim on May 01, 2009, 01:44:50 am ---Get the hell outta here.
--- End quote ---
I'm pretty sure the feeling is mutual. ;)
genesim:
Why because I am speaking the truth!
This is exactly what I mean. This is a bald faced LIE. The original Atari 2600 on the TV's had those lines. Are you going to be so blind as to say this isn't true?
Also what is clever but also a bald faced lie is the screenshot. The ghosts "ghosting" are there on the Stella emulator through the LCD.
If you weren't so busy putting me down you would actually see my point.
This whole pitiful arguement about CRT's being better in this particular capacity has got to be the biggest lie on the internet.
Maybe the only way to settle this is for me to go out and take tons of pictures. Compare it myself. I already have with the local place that has Pacman and I compared the differences which do not exist at all. Most of this is starting to look like the complete lie that it is.
But rest assured, for a fact the Atari 2600 and the "blending" does not exist. Bud I was there playing with crappy tv's going through crappy ATANNAE connections! Not RF as the author puts it. You needed a converter box for the original old TV's. Remember switching back and forth?
Probably not because you more then likely were not there at the time and you try to speak about knowing so much, but in reality you know far less then me. Of course if I don't dot an "I" it somehow proves I know NOTHING.... :laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2: That is why you want me to go away. You want to keep your fantasy alive and well.
Sell it to someone else, I have exposed this for what it is. One of the biggest lie's on the internet. If I ever met these programmers I would grill them on this very subject. Guess what, in all likelyhood they would agree with me. They probably laugh at all this splitting hairs crap. Even your link was funny. Notice this notice that. :laugh2: :laugh2:
Oh and for the record refresh rate can be the same as frame rate if programmed correctly. Hence 24fps on a movie being perfect for 120hz becaust it is an even devisor....same as 15hz signal into 120hz. It is still a 1:1 scale up...so if the programmers worked with that as the way they intended it to be displayed, then the same could be true for a even divisor scale up.
Of course many like to overlook this verifiable fact. The only problem is round pixels vs square...and even that is proved not to be a problem. Read the Atari article...even the supposed way the programmers wanted it done support my case...but guess what, that is a load of bull too because they programmed because of limitations. Not purposeful visions. That crap still cracks me up to where I almost split my side.
This house is clean.
genesim:
--- Quote ---Not RF as the author puts it.
--- End quote ---
OOOPS I MADE A MISTAKE. I RECOGNIZED THIS SO DON'T COOK ME CHEFFO.
I was thinking of the RF connection as opposed to the VHF signal. MY BAD!!!
GET THIS AGAIN, I MADE A MISTAKE SO NO NEED TO POINT IT OUT.
genesim:
CheffoJeffo:
--- Quote from: genesim on May 01, 2009, 09:01:08 am ---Probably not because you more then likely were not there at the time and you try to speak about knowing so much, but in reality you know far less then me. Of course if I don't dot an "I" it somehow proves I know NOTHING.... Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! That is why you want me to go away. You want to keep your fantasy alive and well.
...
Oh and for the record refresh rate can be the same as frame rate if programmed correctly. Hence 24fps on a movie being perfect for 120hz becaust it is an even devisor....same as 15hz signal into 120hz. It is still a 1:1 scale up...so if the programmers worked with that as the way they intended it to be displayed, then the same could be true for a even divisor scale up.
--- End quote ---
Once again, you choose the route of the Belligerent Kool Aid Man (I will be eternally grateful to Chad for coining that name for you because it fits so well ... only wish that I had come up with it so I could tag it with a tm).
It isn't so much that you don't dot an i or cross a t ... it is that you genuinely don't understand the fundamentals of the technologies that you are talking about.
For example, once again, you refer to 15hz (sic) as a refresh rate (getting the terminology, meaning and the cardinality of the metric completely wrong). It is the same as your mythical "light beams inside the CRT".
They don't exist anywhere but inside your head.
As a result, the conclusions that are so painfully obvious to you, which make the rest of us appear stupid in your eyes, are based on fallacy.
Most arcade games refresh at 60Hz with standard res games running a 15KHz scan rate. You continue to confuse the two, despite my having slapped you down about it several times.
Learn the math that underlies the relationship between the horizontal scan rate, resolution and vertical refresh rate -- it's a simple multiplicative relation, so you should be able to handle the concepts ... well, maybe not ...
--- Quote from: genesim on May 01, 2009, 09:01:08 am ---Probably not because you more then likely were not there at the time and you try to speak about knowing so much, but in reality you know far less then me.
--- End quote ---
That is probably the first time that I have ever been accused of not being old enough ... I'm not sure whether to be pleased or insulted.
One of us has worked on both authentic arcade equipment and modern PC equipment.
And everybody knows that it ain't you.