| Main > Main Forum |
| CRT look and feel on a LCD |
| << < (6/21) > >> |
| genesim:
Oh so what I said about the Atari isn't fact? Oh you didn't call me a moron for preferring LCD and thinking it looks better? I don't deserve to EVER be called a MORON. The fact that you think you are EVER justified is what is very very wrong with you and anyone who supports such behavior. The difference between you and I is that I never claimed my name calling was right. I have never stated the coders are wrong, and I want the facts that they did program for this. Specifically for Donkey Kong...Pacman...Galaga....Dig Dug...or any other such madness. I don't believe it for one second. But hey, I am open to proof and not...this guy posts. |
| CheffoJeffo:
How the ---fudgesicle--- did a simple, humourous reply to a overly-capitalized-yelling-because-nobody-likes-me and poorly-contextually-positioned movie quote warrant 5 follow-up posts ? Cheffo genesim Lighten up, Francis! |
| genesim:
Uh because you attempted a very bad comeback...and then of course Hoopz attempted a very bad explanation...and then I succeeded in making both of you look pathetic. Of course your problem was this. I had seeds in FACTS because of my post about the Atari screen being flawed...you followed around trying to get me for not crossing t's and Hoopz tries to get me with spelling. Of course both are symantacs(sp) and not worth it when you get to the meat of what I have always written. It is splitting hairs...on splitting hairs...on splitting hairs in its origins(being the code). Arguing over which hairs should be split is so silly that the over the top way that you say you are supreme over me is just flawed...because the premise is a guess to begin with! And what happened to the fictional character...yuck yuck..that was a good un! |
| CheffoJeffo:
--- Quote from: genesim on May 01, 2009, 10:43:13 am --- Oh you didn't call me a moron for preferring LCD and thinking it looks better? --- End quote --- No, I called you a moron because you kept saying stupidly incorrect things and telling everybody who disagreed that they were wrong. --- Quote from: genesim on May 01, 2009, 10:43:13 am ---I don't deserve to EVER be called a MORON. --- End quote --- I acknowledge that and have, as a result, been trying to use Belligerent Kool Aid Man instead. :cheers: --- Quote from: genesim on May 01, 2009, 10:43:13 am ---The fact that you think you are EVER justified is what is very very wrong with you --- End quote --- And here I thought it was that I was a Crybaby turd tosser egotistical self righteous miserable coward stink hole ... I am so confused. :dizzy: --- Quote from: genesim on May 01, 2009, 10:43:13 am ---The difference between you and I is that I never claimed my name calling was right. --- End quote --- Actually, you denied your name calling completely. |
| ChadTower:
--- Quote from: CheffoJeffo on May 01, 2009, 09:35:23 am ---Once again, you choose the route of the Belligerent Kool Aid Man (I will be eternally grateful to Chad for coining that name for you because it fits so well ... only wish that I had come up with it so I could tag it with a tm). --- End quote --- :laugh2: The 2600 is a terrible example for this debate, guys. It's the only one that doesn't actually have the refresh rate handled in hardware like everything else on the planet. It was done in software making it a unique beast. Having done a good amoung of 2600 coding has given me a healthy fear of the sync routines necessary to keep it drawing in sync with the TV's scan guns. No, I haven't read the whole thread, as most of it is fighting... but I did see that pic and the 2600 DID look blurry on many TVs. That wasn't a function of the 2600 itself, thogh, that was a function of crappy TV/GAME switchboxes that heavily degraded the signal. Those got old FAST and had a heavy effect on graphics quality. The simple switch to a female RCA->coax video adapter does wonders towards cleaning up what a lot of people remember as "color bleed" on the 2600. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |