Main > Main Forum

Vista VS front end?

Pages: << < (2/8) > >>

lettuce:

Vista doesnt work with mame based stuff that well at all really, if you want to use mame 64 best bet is to get XP 64

loadman:


--- Quote from: Bender on October 12, 2008, 10:27:41 am ---anyone out there using a front end that "plays nice" with Vista?

I've tried MaLa and Maximus
and the both work, but with little gliches I'd like to avoid on a cab

I know, I know use XP ;)
But I'd like to take advantage of vista64 and mame 64


--- End quote ---

Yes I vote for XP too

But do tell what 'glitches' there are (if any) with MaLa & Vista32 so I can fix them  ;)
Possibly in a new thread in the MaLa Forum section.

I finally have a Vista32 Box in the MaLa dev lab to test stuff  ;)

retrometro:

vista x64 worked fine for me with mala.  however, vista x64 and soft15khz are no go.  that alone made me go back to xp x64 so i don't have to settle for an arcadevga card and suffer for non mame emulation.




protokatie:

To answer the origonal post. AtomicFe works perfectly with VISTA 32. I dont know about vista 64 tho...

If you were to go with vista, I would say vista32 on a dualcore (to help speed up MAME). Otherwise I would really just say use TinyXP.

Lilwolf:

btw, what does 'not playing nice' mean?  flashing background screens ect?

just curious?  (I've used xp64, and vista 64 for like a week before I upgraded back to xp... but this was before a few essentials wheren't ported to a 64 bit platform)

Pages: << < (2/8) > >>

Go to full version