| Main > Main Forum |
| Vista VS front end? |
| << < (2/8) > >> |
| lettuce:
Vista doesnt work with mame based stuff that well at all really, if you want to use mame 64 best bet is to get XP 64 |
| loadman:
--- Quote from: Bender on October 12, 2008, 10:27:41 am ---anyone out there using a front end that "plays nice" with Vista? I've tried MaLa and Maximus and the both work, but with little gliches I'd like to avoid on a cab I know, I know use XP ;) But I'd like to take advantage of vista64 and mame 64 --- End quote --- Yes I vote for XP too But do tell what 'glitches' there are (if any) with MaLa & Vista32 so I can fix them ;) Possibly in a new thread in the MaLa Forum section. I finally have a Vista32 Box in the MaLa dev lab to test stuff ;) |
| retrometro:
vista x64 worked fine for me with mala. however, vista x64 and soft15khz are no go. that alone made me go back to xp x64 so i don't have to settle for an arcadevga card and suffer for non mame emulation. |
| protokatie:
To answer the origonal post. AtomicFe works perfectly with VISTA 32. I dont know about vista 64 tho... If you were to go with vista, I would say vista32 on a dualcore (to help speed up MAME). Otherwise I would really just say use TinyXP. |
| Lilwolf:
btw, what does 'not playing nice' mean? flashing background screens ect? just curious? (I've used xp64, and vista 64 for like a week before I upgraded back to xp... but this was before a few essentials wheren't ported to a 64 bit platform) |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |