Main > Main Forum
Logitech G25 Too Much For Mame?
<< < (7/10) > >>
shardian:
The logitech G25 is WAAAAAAYYYYYYY too much for MAME. You cannot use ANY of the functionality of the G25. You are better off with a $5 goodwill wheel and pedals.
Visitor Q:

--- Quote from: Ginsu Victim on October 08, 2008, 03:57:41 pm ---You questioned whether the word was considered bad or not, and I addressed it. I didn't post the same thing as Hoopz.

You hijacked your own thread by arguing with RetroGreg rather than thanking Jeffo for the links.

--- End quote ---

No hoopz addressed that, you reiterated it.

Maybe you should read/ re-read reply #12 and wonder why I did not thank him.

Then when you are done there, read/ re-read reply #19.

I'm not looking for a Father Figure here Ginsu or an argument but you are sure trying your best to turn it into one.  :dunno
Visitor Q:

--- Quote from: shardian on October 08, 2008, 04:06:08 pm ---The logitech G25 is WAAAAAAYYYYYYY too much for MAME. You cannot use ANY of the functionality of the G25. You are better off with a $5 goodwill wheel and pedals.


--- End quote ---

Yeah I mean $300 is what it retails for and although it looks like it is great for PC games it seems it does not act in a way like you say to utilize a lot of Mame games. I see that there is another version for $100 that Logitech offers that does have force feedback and maybe that would be better suited?
mountain:

--- Quote from: shardian on October 08, 2008, 04:06:08 pm ---The logitech G25 is WAAAAAAYYYYYYY too much for MAME. You cannot use ANY of the functionality of the G25. You are better off with a $5 goodwill wheel and pedals.


--- End quote ---

Right. If i were to build a full size, PC/XBOX sit down driving cabinet, then it would be worth it for sure.
Ginsu Victim:

--- Quote from: Visitor Q on October 08, 2008, 04:08:12 pm ---
--- Quote from: Ginsu Victim on October 08, 2008, 03:57:41 pm ---You questioned whether the word was considered bad or not, and I addressed it. I didn't post the same thing as Hoopz.

You hijacked your own thread by arguing with RetroGreg rather than thanking Cheffo for the links.

--- End quote ---

No hoopz addressed that, you reiterated it.

Maybe you should read/ re-read reply #12 and wonder why I did not thank him.

Then when you are done there, read/ re-read reply #19.

I'm not looking for a Father Figure here Ginsu or an argument but you are sure trying your best to turn it into one.  :dunno

--- End quote ---

None of my posts have a harsh tone. I simply pointed out facts.

Just like this post.

I haven't tried to make this an argument at all, because, like I said, you did that once you acknowledged RetroGreg.

Next time, just say thanks to Cheffo and follow the links.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page

Go to full version