Main > Software Forum
Favorite Front End
Ginsu Victim:
--- Quote from: abispac on October 10, 2009, 06:13:40 pm ---If atomic fe its sucha great FE for his creator, why trying to make it look like hyperspin? bad bad bad....... :cheers: be original.....
--- End quote ---
Because it can look similar to Hyperspin, though running on lower specs. It's not the default look of AtomicFE anyway, but it is an option for those who don't have a fast PC in their cabinet.
headkaze:
--- Quote from: Ginsu Victim on October 10, 2009, 07:17:47 pm ---Because it can look similar to Hyperspin, though running on lower specs. It's not the default look of AtomicFE anyway, but it is an option for those who don't have a super fast PC in their cabinet.
--- End quote ---
I didn't realise HyperSpin needed a super fast PC to run it? I remember running it through Remote Desktop and it ran at a fairly decent framerate, so as far as I could tell it didn't even need a fast video card.
brian_hoffman:
Yea, I guess it depends on your vision of superfast, HS should be used on a 2.0 dual core for best perormance,
Although I have it running pretty well on a little ATOM 1.6 like what you see in most netbooks ok.
If you are using a PIII 600 using dosmame and expect to run HS you are not going to have much luck.
:)
Ginsu Victim:
"Super fast" was the wrong thing to say.
I meant that there are people who use computers that are lower than 1 Ghz in their MAME cabs. I wasn't trying to say you have to have a top of the line PC to run Hyperspin, but there are some people who want that look, but didn't have an option until AtomicFE offered one.
Ummon:
And, the layouts are totally different (which I'm getting from youki's comments are not simple code translations or something, but manully done). It's mainly the background art that's the same.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version