Main > Everything Else
Neighborhood problem turns violent
patrickl:
The comparison is valid. Well maybe tigers is a bit too much, but a Puma is a perfectly valid comparison.
I wonder why you would think it's not valid.
Wild animals can be domesticated. They rarely attack and with the right trainer they sort of never attack. Just you claim with like pit bulls. Of course, just like with pit bulls, when they attack they do a lot of damage. Whichg is exactly why both puma's and pit bulls are not fit to be kept as pets.
tommy:
A Puma would kill 2 or 3 pits at a time. How is that fair? A puma has to kill to eat and knows nothing other than just jumping on things that move and killing it, how is that fair? This is not fair and you'd be silly to think otherwise.
tommy:
Read.
http://blogs.britannica.com/blog/main/2007/05/the-pit-bull-debate/
I'm sure this will do nothing to change your one track mind, but still...
patrickl:
--- Quote ---
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: tommy on January 14, 2008, 06:45:42 pm ---Read.
http://blogs.britannica.com/blog/main/2007/05/the-pit-bull-debate/
I'm sure this will do nothing to change your one track mind, but still...
--- End quote ---
Well I agree with some of it:
--- Quote ---Pit Bulls (along with Rottweilers) are the types most often involved in fatal attacks against humans, often children.
--- End quote ---
Other than that it's the same delusional ¨I treat my dog well so fer suuuure my pit won't maul anyone even though the statistics and actual research show otherwise.¨
tommy:
What did you agree with exactly? Only the parts where it does not support my feelings?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version