Main > Everything Else

12-0, 8-4

<< < (6/9) > >>

ChadTower:

With the obvious subplot being that the 18-0 Pats are looking for revenge for 1996 - Favre's other Super Bowl appearance.

shardian:

--- Quote from: ChadTower on December 17, 2007, 09:24:39 am ---
With the obvious subplot being that the 18-0 Pats are looking for revenge for 1996 - Favre's other Super Bowl appearance.

--- End quote ---

Hehe, yeah we kicked your ass then. ;D The way the Packers are playing right now, they are the team that has the best chance to beat the Pats.

ChadTower:

It wasn't nearly as much Brett Favre as it was ---smurfing--- Desmond Howard.  I still can't stand that dillhole.

shardian:

--- Quote from: ChadTower on December 17, 2007, 09:28:53 am ---
It wasn't nearly as much Brett Favre as it was ---smurfing--- Desmond Howard.  I still can't stand that dillhole.

--- End quote ---

In a way, he changed the game. I don't think before him, teams were assigning a good player to being only a return specialist.
Now everyone is trying to create a "lights out return specialist".

Of course, that idiot didn't like being a specialist, so he left and thus entered mediocrity receiver status.

ChadTower:

There were plenty of guys like him for years before him.  I'm not sure how you can say he was a good player limited to a return role - he never had any success with anything else in NFL. 

I don't think they're trying to create return specialists now - when a team gets a guy like Hester the first thing they do is try to put him someplace else too.  They always end up on offense (plus Hester in particular is a starter on D anyway).

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version