Main > Main Forum
4Ghz Core 2 Duo vs M.A.M.E. 0.120 (benchmark results)
massive88:
--- Quote from: Popcorrin on July 16, 2008, 04:04:06 pm ---I'm running xp64. Does anyone know if there is a difference in performance between running xp 64 as compared to vista 64?
--- End quote ---
In my own personal tests, I found them to be dead on the exact same. Now thats on a small sample size to be sure, but it was enough to convince me that it did not make a difference big enough to worry about.
John IV [MameUI64]:
The best CPUs for Mame just got a price cut.. FYI. Should have held out a little longer for the e8500 (31% cut!) now the same price I paid for my e8400.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=2267
Here’s a rundown of the price cuts on the desktop:
Q6600 (Quad-core, 2.40GHz)
Now: $193 | Was: $224 - 14% cut
E8500 (Dual-core, 3.16GHz)
Now: $183 | Was: $266 - 31% cut
E8400 (Dual-core, 3.00GHz)
Now: $163 | Was: $183 - 11% cut
E7200 (Dual-core, 2.53GHz)
Now: $113 | Was: $133 - 15% cut
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
john iv
http://mameui.classicgaming.gamespy.com/
Blanka:
The E8500 is the same as a E8400, only tested longer at the given speed. They both clock over equally well to around 4ghz.
divemaster127:
I have a e8500 arriving from newegg today, it will replace my e6850
dm
lettuce:
Got a E7200 back the other week for my new cab, OC to 3.8ghz ;D, thats about a 52% increase in performace! :cheers: