| Main > Main Forum |
| 4Ghz Core 2 Duo vs M.A.M.E. 0.120 (benchmark results) |
| << < (51/104) > >> |
| massive88:
--- Quote from: Popcorrin on July 16, 2008, 04:04:06 pm ---I'm running xp64. Does anyone know if there is a difference in performance between running xp 64 as compared to vista 64? --- End quote --- In my own personal tests, I found them to be dead on the exact same. Now thats on a small sample size to be sure, but it was enough to convince me that it did not make a difference big enough to worry about. |
| John IV [MameUI64]:
The best CPUs for Mame just got a price cut.. FYI. Should have held out a little longer for the e8500 (31% cut!) now the same price I paid for my e8400. http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=2267 Here’s a rundown of the price cuts on the desktop: Q6600 (Quad-core, 2.40GHz) Now: $193 | Was: $224 - 14% cut E8500 (Dual-core, 3.16GHz) Now: $183 | Was: $266 - 31% cut E8400 (Dual-core, 3.00GHz) Now: $163 | Was: $183 - 11% cut E7200 (Dual-core, 2.53GHz) Now: $113 | Was: $133 - 15% cut -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- john iv http://mameui.classicgaming.gamespy.com/ |
| Blanka:
The E8500 is the same as a E8400, only tested longer at the given speed. They both clock over equally well to around 4ghz. |
| divemaster127:
I have a e8500 arriving from newegg today, it will replace my e6850 dm |
| lettuce:
Got a E7200 back the other week for my new cab, OC to 3.8ghz ;D, thats about a 52% increase in performace! :cheers: |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |