Main > Main Forum

4Ghz Core 2 Duo vs M.A.M.E. 0.120 (benchmark results)

Pages: << < (42/104) > >>

divemaster127:

I have 2 q6600 & 3.45 was also the best I could overclock with the coolers I am using
dm

rdenis:

I haven't tried going higher yet but I know some guys are claiming to have got the quads stable at 3.8 on air - I don't think I believe it.

rdenis:

DM - did you run the benchmarks at 3.45 - how did they compare?

Rich

divemaster127:

I'm not using either of these computers for mame, I have a dual core e6850 in my mame system
dm

u_rebelscum:


--- Quote from: rdenis on March 17, 2008, 02:53:08 pm ---But I have no idea how to benchmark so if someone could kindly point the way I am more than willing to spend the time and post some results.
...
In addition to how do I benchmark, what 64 bit version of Mame should I compile to run the tests?

--- End quote ---

Look at Taz's first post in this thread to see what settings he's using.  I'm not sure how others are setting up (search for "seconds_to_run" or "-str" in this thread for examples), but other standard ways can be found at mamebenchmark (about what Taz is using AFAICT) and mameui sites.  The problem with MameBenchmark is -video ddraw; the default is now d3d and most (non-aarcade monitor cabs) people use it now.  MameUI's settings have -video none, which is rarely used too.

Pages: << < (42/104) > >>

Go to full version