| Main > Main Forum |
| 4Ghz Core 2 Duo vs M.A.M.E. 0.120 (benchmark results) |
| << < (42/104) > >> |
| divemaster127:
I have 2 q6600 & 3.45 was also the best I could overclock with the coolers I am using dm |
| rdenis:
I haven't tried going higher yet but I know some guys are claiming to have got the quads stable at 3.8 on air - I don't think I believe it. |
| rdenis:
DM - did you run the benchmarks at 3.45 - how did they compare? Rich |
| divemaster127:
I'm not using either of these computers for mame, I have a dual core e6850 in my mame system dm |
| u_rebelscum:
--- Quote from: rdenis on March 17, 2008, 02:53:08 pm ---But I have no idea how to benchmark so if someone could kindly point the way I am more than willing to spend the time and post some results. ... In addition to how do I benchmark, what 64 bit version of Mame should I compile to run the tests? --- End quote --- Look at Taz's first post in this thread to see what settings he's using. I'm not sure how others are setting up (search for "seconds_to_run" or "-str" in this thread for examples), but other standard ways can be found at mamebenchmark (about what Taz is using AFAICT) and mameui sites. The problem with MameBenchmark is -video ddraw; the default is now d3d and most (non-aarcade monitor cabs) people use it now. MameUI's settings have -video none, which is rarely used too. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |