Main > Main Forum
4Ghz Core 2 Duo vs M.A.M.E. 0.120 (benchmark results)
Tiger-Heli:
Okay, sorry!
divemaster127:
I was going to wait until next week, to post my results for the new mame machine, my main desktop is a q6600 quad core, its 200% faster than my 6600 dual core I was running, so I ordered the same machine for my mame
q6600 quad core
4 gig of ram
gigabyte motherboard
I will have the parts in on wednesday, as soon as I'm built I will list the fps on the higher end chd games
dm
taz-nz:
--- Quote from: divemaster127 on October 29, 2007, 02:29:18 pm ---I was going to wait until next week, to post my results for the new mame machine, my main desktop is a q6600 quad core, its 200% faster than my 6600 dual core I was running, so I ordered the same machine for my mame
q6600 quad core
4 gig of ram
gigabyte motherboard
I will have the parts in on wednesday, as soon as I'm built I will list the fps on the higher end chd games
dm
--- End quote ---
I'll be really interested to see how the roms that ran on 3DFX hardware do on your system, it will be interesting to see how the new MAME multithreading scales on a quad core.
metahacker:
isnt mame with -mt just 2 threads ? with the second thread just doing framebuffer stuff.
im not sure what else would be left for the other cpus to do other than 'run' disk i/o on CHDs or eat up cycles in AC97 ? i would think the mame helper thread would not busy up the 2nd core enough to need a 3rd or 4th.
but i really hope you do see some improvement. it's nice to see new hardware tech making emus catch up and making stuff that was previously unusable now useful.
btw 500 fsb is ---smurfing--- hot. nice work on your set up dood im impressed.
im runnin a e6600 @ 3.4 here on my desktop. abit in9 32x max (i dont recommend it, unless u just want the cool BIOS-driven LEDs mounted under the mobo stock :)) had to crank ~1.7v into it tho, for whatever reason. scythe infinity 120. 1 total fan in the system besides psu. no nb/sb mods besides as5, no fans.
c2ds are mean. reminds me of the old celeron 300A, but even better.
i hope i can get something comparable to your results with my new 2.66 6750. i dont think i'll be hittin any 4GHz tho.
it sure is inspiring to see your results, though....
and apparently 120u1 pentium-M optimized is where the party's at....
divemaster127:
Good or bad, I have used pctuneup for my benchmarks up until a few months ago
I have a 6600 intel dual core...
score on pctuneup for 6600 intel 3400 w/vista
I also built a 6750 for my racer score 3650 w/vista
2 months I rebuilt my 6600 to a q6600 quad core score 7300 w/vista
I am going to run a strip down xp w/over clock i'm hoping to close to 8000 w/my quad core xp, since xp is faster than vista, its worth a try
dm