Main > Software Forum
MAME Compiler 64 v2.0.197
TeutonicDarkness:
Hello,
Does this work with the newest version .120?
I did try but either I just don't know what I'm doing
( A very likely case )
or it just didn't work.
After compiling It did load Mame fine ...
However all the Roms issued error messages
and now Mame crashes as well.
My assumptions are using .120 and I only wanted the
High Score - No nag patch i would just apply..
hi_119u2.diff
then compile.
Is that correct?
Thanks in Advance....
SGT:
Did you click <APPLY PATCH> before clicking <GO> to compile? It worked well for me when I tried it yesterday with .120. How old are your roms (what version was working successfully)?
Kudos to headkaze. :applaud: :notworthy:
TeutonicDarkness:
--- Quote from: SGT on October 23, 2007, 09:29:51 pm ---Did you click <APPLY PATCH> before clicking <GO> to compile? It worked well for me when I tried it yesterday with .120. How old are your roms (what version was working successfully)?
Kudos to headkaze. :applaud: :notworthy:
--- End quote ---
Honestly don't know how old roms are I attained them
from various sources on the net.
I have tested with 117 and 120 and roms work.
Yes I clicked apply patch ...just thought I was overlooking
something maybe?
Am I right though with only having to apply:
hi_119u2.diff .......
Thanks...
SGT:
--- Quote ---Am I right though with only having to apply:
hi_119u2.diff .......
--- End quote ---
That's all that I did. Is it possible that you put the compiled executables into an existing folder where an older version resided?
TeutonicDarkness:
--- Quote from: SGT on October 24, 2007, 08:34:20 am ---
--- Quote ---Am I right though with only having to apply:
hi_119u2.diff .......
--- End quote ---
That's all that I did. Is it possible that you put the compiled executables into an existing folder where an older version resided?
--- End quote ---
No Definitely not...
I Put them in a New folder called:
Mame120_No_Nag
I'm going to keep messing around ...
I don't know what I could have done wrong
but something is obviously going wrong here.
Thanks for clearing that up..