Main > Software Forum

MAME Compiler 64 v2.0.197

Pages: << < (28/178) > >>

joebells:

thanks for the reply, what about

dinput.lib(dilib2.obj) : warning LNK4078: multiple '.text' sections found with different attributes (C0500040)

I imagine its nothing just figured I'd ask

joebells:

ok I just tried to play using my 64 bit mame that I compiled using your tool and it runs but its uber choppy.  When I tried to setup my keys and such it worked at first but then it "Froze" as I was trying to set them up. I was able to escape out of the config menu and then escape out of the program all the way. When I exited it shows exception at eip=.(bunch of numbers)... : access violation in the command box. The second time I ran it, it just froze when I pressed tab and tried to adjust a key.

I've run the precompiled 64bit and it runs really well, I was hoping for high score support though. Hopefully its something simple, actually as I'm finishing this I remembered I did tune it for core 2 duo(which is what I have) I think I'll try to do it without that optimization.

arzoo:

If I'm running with an AMD Athlon Thunderbird processor, do you think the AthlonXP optimization will help (or harm)? Thanks!

Update: Putting aside the optimization question, the utility worked perfectly for me. Thanks Headkaze  :cheers:

keirondrk:

heyyy just to say a big thanks for the compiler.... I never got around to compiling mame myself until I found your app and thought why not give it a go , excellent !!! saved me eventually having to sit down with the step by step guide and do it myself (which I must admit until I found your app I wasn't in that much of a rush to get udiff updates applied)...


quick simple painless... always worked since day 1 for me....

now I apply the u diffs as they come out... (think I'm a Obsessive-compulsive MAME compiler?!)

now off to apply .124u2 ;) while I await a hiscore diff from MKChamp hehe

KEEP UP THE EXCELLENT WORK, YOU'VE SERIOUSLY IMPROVED MY MAME EXPERIENCE AND SIMPLIFIED IT GREATLY :)

--tested since .123 with all the u updates... and now onto .124 and pentium m builds

headkaze:


--- Quote from: arzoo on April 10, 2008, 01:38:42 pm ---If I'm running with an AMD Athlon Thunderbird processor, do you think the AthlonXP optimization will help (or harm)? Thanks!

Update: Putting aside the optimization question, the utility worked perfectly for me. Thanks Headkaze  :cheers:

--- End quote ---

I actually don't know much about the optimization options. I guess without doing some benchmarking it's hard to say if there is much improvement using them.

Pages: << < (28/178) > >>

Go to full version