Main > Everything Else

Need some kind of online peer review

(1/2) > >>

shmokes:
I'm in a class that is divided in groups of four.  A bunch of work will be assigned to the group, and then that work is divided evenly between members.  Each member is only responsible to each other for doing their part, though.  The work is turned in as a group assignment and graded as a whole. 

I would like to be able to publish Word documents to the web so that other people can critique it and make suggestions.  I stumbled across Google Docs which is awesome and almost what I'm looking for.  With Google Docs I can publish a document and share it with the other members of my group and they have full access to make changes to the document.  There is even a revision history, which really brings it close to what I'm looking for . . . but not quite.

What I want is the ability to insert comments.  I don't want to be able to change any of my classmates' papers.  I just want to be able to insert a comment with a suggestion.  I envision it basically as just showing up as a little colored flag in the text and when you click on it, the flag expands into a bubble with the comment.  And I would want every member of the group to be able to see all the comments left so they can leave comments saying, "No . . . I like it the way it is," or, "I agree that it should be changed, but I think what would REALLY sound better is . . . ".

There is a website called TurnItIn.com that schools are using, primarily because of the system's ability to automatically identifying plagiarism, in which documents can be marked up by a professor in this way.  But it's an incredibly expensive service that is basically only marketed to universities in gigantic bulk-licenses.  I need something much more free-of-charge than that   :)

Anybody know of such a thing?

patrickl:
So you don't want to use the "track changes" feature that Word itself has?

I never had any problem using it. I leave comments in other people's papers, suggest changes (which they can then accept or reject or even change upon) You don't really change the document. You set up changes and comments with which the original author than can do with as they please.

But then I don't normally have my work reviewed by 3 people. I guess there are some logistical issues with "track changes" when there are many people reviewing the same document.

saint:
When I wrote Project Arcade the multiple editors who got their mitts on it all used Word to insert comments and track changes and such.

shmokes:
The way Word does it is exactly what I'm looking for, except for the not being online thing so that multiple people can all comment on a single copy of the document.  The problem with using Word, in my case, comes down to the way our group works.  Our professor might assign eight cases that must be read and briefed (a formal structure that boils cases down into specific elements like, Statement of Facts, Procedural History, Issue, Holding, Doctrinal Reasoning, Policy Reasoning, etc.).

So the problem with Word is that we aren't on a single internal network.  We have to email our work to each other.  If I brief my two cases and email them to each of the three other members in my group, and each of them make comments and send them back, I am suddenly juggling four different copies each case, and they probably all share the same filename.  Then I need to open them up individually and go through the comments, many of which are likely redundant, and decide which ones to incorporate into the "real" copy.  It's kind of a nightmare.

So unless Word's track changes feature has capabilities that I'm not aware of (it very well may, I've hardly used it), I think it's just not very practical here. 

saint:
Ah, meh. All my editing was one person at a time having the document then passing it on. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version