Main > Everything Else

Get rid of Michael Vick CONTACT INFO UPDATE

<< < (5/27) > >>

tommy:
Things are not as black and white as you would like them to be. I've heard  that they are making an example to the world with Vick and trying to get to bigger and "badder" dog fighters.

And i wouldn't use the US government's involvement as credibility to a conviction in any situation anymore, these days. Unfortunately the times have already proven in many situations (WMD) that it means little to nothing what they think they know.

CCM:

--- Quote from: tommy on July 23, 2007, 11:27:46 am ---

... but this far it is nothing but talk. I remember a hard and fast rule we normally go by around these parts... innocent until proven guilty, or something like that.  ::)   Remember?

He may as well be guilty with you people as he has no chance in any of our minds.


--- End quote ---

Tommy, do you actually understand what it means to be indicted by the feds??  Chad mentioned it twice, the feds have a 95% conviction rate.  They don't indict innocent people. 

You're living in a fantasy world if you think the charges against Vick are nothing but talk.  You need to wake up.

ChadTower:

Did he just compare a federal indictment to the WMD situation?

CCM:

--- Quote from: ChadTower on July 23, 2007, 11:46:51 am ---
Did he just compare a federal indictment to the WMD situation?

--- End quote ---

Chad, you beat me to it! 

Tommy, that was just hilarious...

tommy:

--- Quote from: ChadTower on July 23, 2007, 11:46:51 am ---
Did he just compare a federal indictment to the WMD situation?

--- End quote ---


The US goverment is not the know all we would like them to be.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version