Main > Everything Else

Am I the only one amused by Michael Vick?

<< < (14/21) > >>

tommy:

--- Quote from: ChadTower on August 26, 2007, 09:16:42 pm ---
His admission is proof.  If you don't even believe the words out of his mouth than you are never going to believe it happened.

We know it happened because he says it happened. 

--- End quote ---


I know he said and had to admit to some degree of guilt, that's how it goes when you take a deal no matter if you did anything or not.

If these 3 "friends" did not try to sell him out and only try to protect their own ass this would have gone to trial. Now with 3 guys saying they all were there and vick is the mastermind he has no chance. That does not mean what they say is true, but it is really too hard to ignore either way.

Sir Auros:
For an "NFL expert," you sure don't know what you're talking about when it comes to this football player.

tommy:
You're a waste of time to try to talk to, so i won't be doing that anymore.

Sir Auros:

--- Quote from: tommy on August 26, 2007, 10:54:19 pm ---You're a waste of time to try to talk to, so i won't be doing that anymore.

--- End quote ---

The feeling's more than mutual, but I hope you at least realize that your continued defense of Vick only makes you look foolish. It doesn't appear that the rest of the people participating in this thread are so deluded by his celebrity.

shardian:
The only thing really in question is whether he did in fact bet on the dogs, or in fact personally killed them. He does in fact own the house in question. He most definitely was supplying the money for the operation. The Bad Newz Kennels was his company. The sole purpose of the Kennel was to breed Pit Bulls. These facts have nothing to do with his guilty plea, as they are concrete facts based on records. We do not know the specific details of what concrete proof the feds have against Vick regarding the gambling and killings, but it is a pretty safe conclusion that they do in fact have concrete evidence implicating him. They definitely have enough evidence that he can be placed at the scene and he was in fact well aware of what was going on at the property.
The facts are the facts, and they speak for themselves.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version