Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)  (Read 616672 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MKChamp

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 502
  • Last login:February 07, 2024, 02:45:53 pm
  • Stil around.
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #280 on: March 10, 2009, 11:58:57 pm »
And just to also state (if I remember correctly)...on Vista you need to rename it to something other than 'patch'. If I recall, Vista didn't like running something called patch.

mikeveli20

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 49
  • Last login:May 01, 2009, 05:11:14 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #281 on: March 11, 2009, 07:48:53 pm »
How come the 0.129 diff is also the 0.130 diff? Is it ok to apply the 0.129 diff to 0.130?

iAtoria

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 41
  • Last login:August 06, 2019, 10:02:33 am
  • 01101110011001010111011101100010
    • iAtoria
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #282 on: March 11, 2009, 09:41:38 pm »
From what's understood from the site 0.129u7 is the same thing as 0.130, so if it worked for the latest beta it should work for 0.130 as well.

FrizzleFried

  • no one listens to me anyway.
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5144
  • Last login:May 30, 2023, 01:14:24 pm
    • Idaho Garagecade
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #283 on: March 12, 2009, 09:35:09 am »
.130 compiles fine with the .129 HS .diff....
Visit my arcade blog at: www.idahogaragecade.com (Updated 10-28-21)

blib

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
  • Last login:March 12, 2009, 11:27:22 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #284 on: March 12, 2009, 01:41:47 pm »
Compiles okay, but didn't disable the nag screens for .130.

Thank you MKChamp for doing these for us!

FrizzleFried

  • no one listens to me anyway.
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5144
  • Last login:May 30, 2023, 01:14:24 pm
    • Idaho Garagecade
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #285 on: March 12, 2009, 03:14:58 pm »
Strange... I didn't notice but I did only play games I've played before).

Visit my arcade blog at: www.idahogaragecade.com (Updated 10-28-21)

blib

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
  • Last login:March 12, 2009, 11:27:22 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #286 on: March 12, 2009, 03:48:52 pm »
Strange... I didn't notice but I did only play games I've played before).



Think I started up Hunchback and the screenflipping in cocktail mode message popped.  Could you try your set just to make sure I didn't mess up applying the diff.  Much thx. ;)

FrizzleFried

  • no one listens to me anyway.
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5144
  • Last login:May 30, 2023, 01:14:24 pm
    • Idaho Garagecade
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #287 on: March 12, 2009, 04:14:05 pm »
HUNCHBACK (which I've never loaded) booted right up as normal for me.  No message.

I did notice that Hunchback uses the same hardware as that terrible DK clone,  LOGGER...
Visit my arcade blog at: www.idahogaragecade.com (Updated 10-28-21)

MKChamp

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 502
  • Last login:February 07, 2024, 02:45:53 pm
  • Stil around.
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #288 on: March 12, 2009, 06:36:05 pm »
Think I started up Hunchback and the screenflipping in cocktail mode message popped.  Could you try your set just to make sure I didn't mess up applying the diff.  Much thx. ;)

I tried it out and didn't get any 'messages'. You may want to try again and make sure you are using the 'new' compiled version to run the game. If you still have trouble, post the steps you took...usually it's only a slight oversight that causes the issues :-)

blib

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
  • Last login:March 12, 2009, 11:27:22 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #289 on: March 12, 2009, 11:27:22 pm »
Thanks guys!

2nd compile worked.  Sorry for the false report.

 :notworthy:

pitufo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
  • Last login:February 21, 2011, 07:50:44 am
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #290 on: March 25, 2009, 09:39:57 am »
You patch will not work with another osd than windows, just because of whitebox removal.

I use SDL osd, under linux, but some windows user may wants to use SDL under windows (and don't forget *BSD users  >:D)

I may understand that whitebox is annoying but I prefer, by far, having hiscore working  ;D

A quick and dirty way for those who wants the hiscore with sdlmame is to edit  the file

 
Code: [Select]
SDLMAME_SOURCE_ROOT/src/osd/sdl/videos.c
and add to the file

Code: [Select]
void osd_update_hi(running_machine *machine, int skip_redraw)
{
sdl_window_info *window;

// if we're not skipping this redraw, update all windows
if (!skip_redraw)
{
profiler_mark(PROFILER_BLIT);
for (window = sdl_window_list; window != NULL; window = window->next)
sdlwindow_video_window_update(machine, window);
profiler_mark(PROFILER_END);
}

// poll the joystick values here
sdlinput_poll(machine);
check_osd_inputs(machine);

if (machine->debug_flags & DEBUG_FLAG_ENABLED)
debugwin_update_during_game(machine);
}

It's just a copy paste of osd_update.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2009, 09:43:26 am by pitufo »

cmoses

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 718
  • Last login:July 27, 2023, 05:19:00 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #291 on: March 25, 2009, 04:40:52 pm »
I have compiled MAME before without issue, but am having a problem with the 0130 version.  I am using the latest MameCompliler64 version, I downloaded the source and the update and the MameUI source.  I have MameUI and Disable Warnings as Errors both checked. I apply the patch fine, but when I begin the compile I get the following errors:

MameUI.mak:40: warning: overriding commands for target 'mameui32.exe'
makefile:543: warning: ignoring old commands for target 'mameui32.exe'

It continues to compile but then I get an error that says

Linking obj/winui/mame/osd/winui/mkhelp.exe
obj/winui/mame/ods/winui/mkhelp.exe src/osd/winui/mameui.rc >src/osd/winui/helpids.c
mingw32-make: *** [src/osd/winui/helpids.c] Error 1
Finished!

When I check there is no mameui.exe file created, so it appears to have failed.  Can anyone make any suggestions as to what is causing this?  I have compiled a few versions, but nothing since 0127.  I went back and looked but did not see anything in this thread that seems to help.

Thanks

MKChamp

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 502
  • Last login:February 07, 2024, 02:45:53 pm
  • Stil around.
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #292 on: March 27, 2009, 05:56:05 pm »
I have compiled MAME before without issue, but am having a problem with the 0130 version.  I am using the latest MameCompliler64 version, I downloaded the source and the update and the MameUI source.  I have MameUI and Disable Warnings as Errors both checked. I apply the patch fine, but when I begin the compile I get the following errors:

MameUI.mak:40: warning: overriding commands for target 'mameui32.exe'
makefile:543: warning: ignoring old commands for target 'mameui32.exe'

It continues to compile but then I get an error that says

Linking obj/winui/mame/osd/winui/mkhelp.exe
obj/winui/mame/ods/winui/mkhelp.exe src/osd/winui/mameui.rc >src/osd/winui/helpids.c
mingw32-make: *** [src/osd/winui/helpids.c] Error 1
Finished!

When I check there is no mameui.exe file created, so it appears to have failed.  Can anyone make any suggestions as to what is causing this?  I have compiled a few versions, but nothing since 0127.  I went back and looked but did not see anything in this thread that seems to help.

Thanks

Don't know if you figured this out yet, but if not, you may want to post it over at Headkaze's compiler thread for some input. This errors aren't related to the hiscore.diff...

DolansCadillac

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 53
  • Last login:April 07, 2021, 05:51:14 pm
  • Can't buy a bucket
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #293 on: April 14, 2009, 11:42:45 am »
This might be a stretch, but has anybody successfully compiled MAME Plus in a way that disables the nag screens using the hiscore diff, or any method for that matter? My experience has been that it just protests a lot during compiling when you use the .diff, and the resulting build runs the same.

blkdog7

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 119
  • Last login:October 07, 2015, 04:43:38 pm
  • Mushroom Kingdom, MA
    • John's Arcade
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #294 on: April 21, 2009, 02:44:03 pm »
I have a question, why aren't the compiled versions available for download anywhere? No Nag and high-score save? Just curious.

cmoses

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 718
  • Last login:July 27, 2023, 05:19:00 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #295 on: April 22, 2009, 09:57:03 am »
I thought the same thing originally, then I did my first compile.  I think the reason is that there are many options when you compile.  The first being Mame vs. MameUI, what type of OS, 32 bit vs 64 bit.  There are also many optimization options for different processors and chipsets.  Intel, AMD, Dual Core, Core 2 Duo, SSE+, SSE-, etc.

So there would be many compiles for each version and most of them are not compatible.  Pick the wrong compile and it won't work on your system. 

Sosetsuken

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 133
  • Last login:November 10, 2014, 02:13:46 pm
  • Da Daaah Da Daaah Da, Da Da Daaah Da
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #296 on: April 23, 2009, 04:35:17 pm »
I have a question, why aren't the compiled versions available for download anywhere? No Nag and high-score save? Just curious.

Because it violates M.A.M.E 's license.  Pre-compiled versions like this (no nag) cause a lot of headaches for the Mamedev's, and really its not THAT complicated to extract a few zips and run one or two commands! (or Click 1 bat file, if you have Mr.Do's compile extras).

FrizzleFried

  • no one listens to me anyway.
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5144
  • Last login:May 30, 2023, 01:14:24 pm
    • Idaho Garagecade
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #297 on: April 25, 2009, 09:32:10 am »
I am having difficulty with the latest .129 patch and MAME .131...

...anyone else having issues?  When compiling  hunk #1 fails crsshair.c.rej


I am using HK'z compiler....
Visit my arcade blog at: www.idahogaragecade.com (Updated 10-28-21)

nuka1195

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 148
  • Last login:April 18, 2020, 08:47:25 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #298 on: April 25, 2009, 11:51:25 am »
shouldn't you be using 130u4 patch?

FrizzleFried

  • no one listens to me anyway.
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5144
  • Last login:May 30, 2023, 01:14:24 pm
    • Idaho Garagecade
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #299 on: April 26, 2009, 10:00:27 am »
shouldn't you be using 130u4 patch?

d0h!

 :cheers:
Visit my arcade blog at: www.idahogaragecade.com (Updated 10-28-21)

mikeveli20

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 49
  • Last login:May 01, 2009, 05:11:14 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #300 on: April 27, 2009, 01:59:15 pm »
Why was the disable_crosshair_patch removed from working in the mame.ini file? I used this option a lot depending on which game I'm playing.

Edit: Nevermind, I just read that this can now be disabled/enabled within mame itself.  :dizzy:
« Last Edit: April 27, 2009, 02:01:28 pm by mikeveli20 »

danfman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 64
  • Last login:November 14, 2009, 10:26:45 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #301 on: May 09, 2009, 10:03:42 pm »
I was following the directions and everything went well until I got to step 8. 

When I type patchmame I get the following error message,

'Patch' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch files

?????????????
"It depends on how you define alone…" –Bill Clinton

bllpla

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12
  • Last login:May 04, 2012, 04:43:22 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #302 on: May 18, 2009, 04:45:20 pm »
hi, would it be beautiful if the two diff were separate to give way to the people to choose which to install, could you divide the two diff, one for "hiscore" and one for with "no nag/white box removal" ?

thanks in advance

headkaze

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2943
  • Last login:August 14, 2023, 02:00:48 am
  • 0x2b|~0x2b?
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #303 on: May 19, 2009, 11:40:36 am »
hi, would it be beautiful if the two diff were separate to give way to the people to choose which to install, could you divide the two diff, one for "hiscore" and one for with "no nag/white box removal" ?

thanks in advance

You can disable any part of the patch in mame.ini

Quote
disable_hiscore_patch   1   <- To disable highscore support. Set to 0 or omit it entirely from ini file to enable.
disable_nagscreen_patch   1  <- To disable removal of nagscreens /white box. Set to 0 or omit it entirely from ini file to enable.
disable_loading_patch   1      <- To disable suppresssion of loading/decypting/etc messages. Set to 0 or omit it entirely from ini file to enable.

bllpla

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12
  • Last login:May 04, 2012, 04:43:22 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #304 on: May 19, 2009, 06:29:59 pm »
hi, would it be beautiful if the two diff were separate to give way to the people to choose which to install, could you divide the two diff, one for "hiscore" and one for with "no nag/white box removal" ?

thanks in advance

You can disable any part of the patch in mame.ini

Quote
disable_hiscore_patch   1   <- To disable highscore support. Set to 0 or omit it entirely from ini file to enable.
disable_nagscreen_patch   1  <- To disable removal of nagscreens /white box. Set to 0 or omit it entirely from ini file to enable.
disable_loading_patch   1      <- To disable suppresssion of loading/decypting/etc messages. Set to 0 or omit it entirely from ini file to enable.

thanks, i know this, but i need to remove nagscreen & loading in a not standard build of mame whit high score already installed :)

i can't understand the metod for remove the whitebox :(
anyone can helpme ?


thanks in advance

danfman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 64
  • Last login:November 14, 2009, 10:26:45 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #305 on: May 20, 2009, 10:14:46 am »
When I right click and save the 131 file it comes up as version 130.
"It depends on how you define alone…" –Bill Clinton

Adultery

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10
  • Last login:December 08, 2014, 06:42:37 am
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #306 on: May 21, 2009, 02:36:17 pm »
Me too. Can I just rename the file to 0.131 or is this the wrong file entirely?

MKChamp

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 502
  • Last login:February 07, 2024, 02:45:53 pm
  • Stil around.
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #307 on: May 21, 2009, 10:23:20 pm »
Me too. Can I just rename the file to 0.131 or is this the wrong file entirely?

The file name doesn't matter. The 130u3 patch works for all MAME versions from 130u3 to the present (131u2 at the time of this post). I only upload a new patch when the MAME core changes to the point the patch no longer 'patches'.

danfman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 64
  • Last login:November 14, 2009, 10:26:45 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #308 on: May 22, 2009, 10:56:27 pm »
Finally got patch working.  Thanks, MKChamp :cheers: Everything is working fine except for one thing.

When I went to the options screen, to re-map some buttons, but instead of seeing the menu I'm use to all I saw were a bunch of white squares where letters and words use to be.  Everything use to work fine when I was using Mame .126 but now that I compiled .131 I have run into this issue.  The same thing happens when I adjust the volume.

‪‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮
"It depends on how you define alone…" –Bill Clinton

Adultery

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10
  • Last login:December 08, 2014, 06:42:37 am
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #309 on: May 22, 2009, 11:45:53 pm »
Thanks for the help. :)

ARTIFACT

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 754
  • Last login:May 30, 2018, 12:32:23 am
    • ARTIFACT - my scratch designed & built arcade cabinet
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #310 on: June 02, 2009, 01:34:39 am »
HEY!

OK I have not compiled my own MAME with this diff in over 2 years

I forgot all about how to do it

THE "mrdo tutorial" link in the 1st post is BROKEN - where cna I read this tutorial?

THANK YOU GUYS

headkaze

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2943
  • Last login:August 14, 2023, 02:00:48 am
  • 0x2b|~0x2b?

moonchilddave

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 90
  • Last login:May 17, 2021, 01:21:04 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #312 on: June 03, 2009, 01:31:47 am »
It looks like there is some kind of issue with the nagscreen part of the patch (at least on my machine).  I'm getting blocks in the in game setup menu.  I didn't think to post here, but you can see what's going on here:

http://forum.arcadecontrols.com/index.php?topic=92673.msg976659

pitufo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
  • Last login:February 21, 2011, 07:50:44 am
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #313 on: June 08, 2009, 02:30:48 pm »
undefined symbols:
  "_osd_update_hi", referenced from:
      _video_frame_update_hi in libemu.a(video.o)
ld: symbol(s) not found
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [mame] Error 1

sdlmame 132, hi_txt 132

FrizzleFried

  • no one listens to me anyway.
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5144
  • Last login:May 30, 2023, 01:14:24 pm
    • Idaho Garagecade
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #314 on: June 09, 2009, 06:43:53 pm »
undefined symbols:
  "_osd_update_hi", referenced from:
      _video_frame_update_hi in libemu.a(video.o)
ld: symbol(s) not found
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [mame] Error 1

sdlmame 132, hi_txt 132

Should we assume this was the result you got when attempting to compile .132?
Visit my arcade blog at: www.idahogaragecade.com (Updated 10-28-21)

MKChamp

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 502
  • Last login:February 07, 2024, 02:45:53 pm
  • Stil around.
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #315 on: June 09, 2009, 11:54:03 pm »
undefined symbols:
  "_osd_update_hi", referenced from:
      _video_frame_update_hi in libemu.a(video.o)
ld: symbol(s) not found
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [mame] Error 1

sdlmame 132, hi_txt 132

Did you do a clean compile? I haven't tried to compile sdlmame...maybe someone else can confirm that the patch works ok for that derivitive.

Avrus

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 400
  • Last login:September 07, 2011, 09:17:25 pm
  • Canada
    • The Avrus Arcade Project 'Conquest'
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #316 on: June 10, 2009, 09:36:12 am »
Compile failure for me also.
______________________________
'Conquest' upright 4 player arcade project log:
http://avrus.blogspot.com/

FrizzleFried

  • no one listens to me anyway.
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5144
  • Last login:May 30, 2023, 01:14:24 pm
    • Idaho Garagecade
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #317 on: June 10, 2009, 09:53:43 am »
I can report that I just succeeded in compiling an XP enhanced version of MAME .132 and I am in the process of compiling an AMD-64 enhanced version (32 bit) and after work I will compile a 64-bit Core2Duo version from the MAME cab and report my findings.  Again,  I had no problems compiling.

EDIT: And I can now confirm that the Core2Duo 64-bit compilation works fine with MAME .132 as well.    All three compiles are standard command line MAME... not a variant.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2009, 02:39:04 pm by FrizzleFried »
Visit my arcade blog at: www.idahogaragecade.com (Updated 10-28-21)

acevedor2

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 380
  • Last login:January 22, 2022, 07:44:45 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #318 on: June 14, 2009, 02:54:11 pm »
I am compiling now for the first time.  Hope this works. One quick question though.  On Mr. Do's site, the directory for mamesrc lists patch.exe as well as patch.bat.  When I extracted the files, there was no patch.exe.  Where does this file come from?  I followed the instructions to a "t" but I am just trying to find out if there will be a problem because patch.exe is not int he directory.  patch.bat is int he directory.  Thanks for the time!
Dedicated - Working:
Asteroids Deluxe
Firefox
Galaxian
Pacman
Viruta Fighter 2
Zombie Raid
Pool Sharks - Pinball

Projects:
Pole Position
Pole Position 2

acevedor2

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 380
  • Last login:January 22, 2022, 07:44:45 pm
Re: hiscore diff (with no nag/white box removal)
« Reply #319 on: June 14, 2009, 03:16:14 pm »
Well I followed the instructions to the letter and the nag screens are still there.  Any thoughts on what could have gone wrong?

I did exactly as mr. do's page described.  I didn't apply any u diffs because I was using 132 and there weren't any listed on the mamedev site.

I created a folder called hi int he mame directory and I also put the hiscore.dat under the mame directory as well.  I downloaded the hi_132.txt file that was listed in this thread and then renamed it to hi_132.diff.  I placed that in the mamesrc directory as required.

It complied fine.  I copied all of the files it created and overwrote the ones in the mame directory as directed.

Still have the nag screens.  Any help would be much appreciated.  Have a great day!
Dedicated - Working:
Asteroids Deluxe
Firefox
Galaxian
Pacman
Viruta Fighter 2
Zombie Raid
Pool Sharks - Pinball

Projects:
Pole Position
Pole Position 2