Sorry for the skepticism, but MS has "promised" multiple mouse support and them removed it a few times. And there was a SDK by a university that did the same as this new one.
Quick history:
MS DOS could do multiple mice with correct drivers and supported software. Then came win95 that the drivers didn't work in, "removing" the multiple mice support.
When directX and directInput came out, some places in the documentation mentioned supporting multiple mice, but it didn't. Later documentation mentioned you couldn't support multiple mice. Then came directX 7.0 (and later) that did support separate inputs from multiple mice in win98 (& later winME, but not win2000) as long as the mice were USB mice. There was a compsci project that supplied a SDK that "simplified" directInput 8.0 and supplied multiple pointers. MameAnalog+ gave multiple mice (starting with directInput 8.0 but switched to 7.0 later), and when official mame changed the development tools to directX 7.0 it got very basic multiple mice support with zero code changes. However, with winXP the directInput multiple mice support was intentionally "not added" (aka removed) for "security reasons". So what does MS do? Come up with "RawInput", which supplies multiple mouse support to winXP but not in win2000, and crashes in win9x. (Official Mame now uses RawInput in winXP when it detects multiiple mice, and directInput in win9x & when there's only one mouse.) I don't now about RawInput and Vista. Now there's another way?
Anyway AFAICT, the only thing that this SDK supplies that RawInput doesn't is drawing the cursors for you. I know it's beta, but ATM the stuff it does not are: support for non-Microsoft mice, support for non-USB mice, and support for coding outside of .NET 3.0.
That said, I'd love to see true, full multiple mouse support (eg: multiple cursors on the desktop) in windows, just to promote multiple mice thinking to more people, and expand past the current prevalent 2D mouse UI. But unless this multipoint SDK gets really extented beyond what it currently does, I don't think it will do the trick; I'm hoping it a good push forward though.