| Main > Everything Else |
| WOW!!! |
| << < (8/13) > >> |
| boykster:
--- Quote from: Texasmame on February 07, 2007, 07:35:46 pm ---This guy seems to be making some sort of energy himself, too! |
| Kaytrim:
--- Quote from: Xiaou2 on February 08, 2007, 03:58:04 am --- Ok, some of the responces were much better. But now, how do you explain this guys version: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/nwjlself.htm Which is self running for 5 minutes without any power source? --- End quote --- How can this version explain anything. He doesn't show you the five minutes that the machine is supposed to be self powered. If this machine is working at overunity then why does it not run forever? |
| boykster:
--- Quote from: Kaytrim on February 08, 2007, 04:09:24 pm ---If this machine is working at overunity then why does it not run forever? --- End quote --- He can't be bothered with details like this, he's a GENIUS!!!! :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: |
| ChadTower:
I never promised you forever, baby... just 5 minutes of 100% efficiency. Now get lost, cab fare's on the dining room table. |
| Samstag:
--- Quote from: Kaytrim on February 08, 2007, 04:09:24 pm --- --- Quote from: Xiaou2 on February 08, 2007, 03:58:04 am --- Ok, some of the responces were much better. But now, how do you explain this guys version: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/nwjlself.htm Which is self running for 5 minutes without any power source? --- End quote --- How can this version explain anything. He doesn't show you the five minutes that the machine is supposed to be self powered. If this machine is working at overunity then why does it not run forever? --- End quote --- That's not really the point. If you put X energy into a system and get X+Y energy out, you have over 100% efficiency, which is what this guy is claiming. He's using it to power lamps, so it can't self-sustain. He doesn't explain why he doesn't put the excess energy back into the motor to make it perpetual. In other words, his demonstration appears to be valid, but his math and/or methods are wrong and he knows it. I once caught a very early sunday morning broadcast here in DFW where a christian "scientist" was explaining how dinosaurs and men lived together and the earth was less than a quarter the present size (less gravity for the dinos). He used a lot of pseudo-scientific jargon and math to make a very convincing argument. He moved quickly enough from point to point that I couldn't easily find the problems with his math or logic. So he convinced me that 5000 years ago the Earth was the size of the moon. A challenge for Xiaou2: I saw someone saw a woman in half, then put her back together again. Disprove it! |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |