Main > Software Forum
Which FrontEnd do you use?
<< < (7/13) > >>
Havok:
Haha - I was wondering what was up with the GameEx votes: they all just seemed to come in around the same time, and overwhelmingly so. Looks like we've got a mini cult going on here!

 ;D

Just don't drink the KoolAid if Headkaze says so though...
Texasmame:
MAME32 for Girlcab.  Just wanted something easy for the primary users and MAME32 is pretty straight-forward.

I'll be using a different front end for MY cab, tho.  One that can run MAME plus 2600, 5200, NES, Coleco, etc. emulators.  Haven't researched enough yet to decide. . .
Havok:

--- Quote from: Texasmame on October 02, 2006, 01:27:36 pm ---MAME32 for Girlcab.  Just wanted something easy for the primary users and MAME32 is pretty straight-forward.

I'll be using a different front end for MY cab, tho.  One that can run MAME plus 2600, 5200, NES, Coleco, etc. emulators.  Haven't researched enough yet to decide. . .

--- End quote ---

I would suggest Atomic for your cab - with all the plug and play modules you've got the emulators already setup to work...
Texasmame:
Just checked out Atomic's site.  Looks like you have to use THEIR modules.  Problem with that is in the file extensions.  All my 2600 ROMs are BIN files, IIRC.  I'd have to rename them LNK or whatever they required for their module.  :(
lingpanda:

--- Quote from: Texasmame on October 02, 2006, 01:27:36 pm ---MAME32 for Girlcab.  Just wanted something easy for the primary users and MAME32 is pretty straight-forward.

I'll be using a different front end for MY cab, tho.  One that can run MAME plus 2600, 5200, NES, Coleco, etc. emulators.  Haven't researched enough yet to decide. . .

--- End quote ---

Looks like a job for GameEx. With it's new install wizard. Setting up a FE has never been so simple.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page

Go to full version