Main > Main Forum

8mb Cache HD in cabinet - worth it??

Pages: << < (2/4) > >>

SirPoonga:

More isn't always better
A 5400rpm drive with 8meg cache will outperform a 7200rpm drive with 2meg cache.


Anyway, go for it, larger games will load faster.

Silverwind:


--- Quote from: SirPoonga on March 17, 2003, 05:46:19 pm ---More isn't always better
A 5400rpm drive with 8meg cache will outperform a 7200rpm drive with 2meg cache.


Anyway, go for it, larger games will load faster.

--- End quote ---

i did not make that comparison, only 5400 to 7200 and 2 meg to 8 meg.. not 7200 2meg to 5400 8 meg..

just as a rule of thumb more is better.. ie 7200rpm 8 meg drive will be faster than a 5400 rpm 8 meg drive..

of course there are many other factors such as the density of the platters.. as a greater density will allow for more data to be read in a single rotation...

more is always better if you compare the same statistic.. (as long as it doesn't cause problems such as excess heat, instability, etc)

radiator:

get the WD drive, they're incredible value for money...

and reviews indicate that they outperform many SCSI drives too

but yeah, the speed increase will only be seen with large data transfers (and booting windows)

 :P

BombProofPlane:

i got that 120gb wd w/8mb cache its great i say get it

lightspeed:


--- Quote from: BombProofPlane on March 17, 2003, 09:12:00 pm ---i got that 120gb wd w/8mb cache its great i say get it

--- End quote ---

It can't hurt,  but you should evalulate the incremental cost and consider spending it on a faster proc or more (and faster) memory.



Pages: << < (2/4) > >>

Go to full version