Main Restorations Software Audio/Jukebox/MP3 Everything Else Buy/Sell/Trade
Project Announcements Monitor/Video GroovyMAME Merit/JVL Touchscreen Meet Up Retail Vendors
Driving & Racing Woodworking Software Support Forums Consoles Project Arcade Reviews
Automated Projects Artwork Frontend Support Forums Pinball Forum Discussion Old Boards
Raspberry Pi & Dev Board controls.dat Linux Miscellaneous Arcade Wiki Discussion Old Archives
Lightguns Arcade1Up Try the site in https mode Site News

Unread posts | New Replies | Recent posts | Rules | Chatroom | Wiki | File Repository | RSS | Submit news

  

Author Topic: 300 DPI needed?  (Read 4095 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ldsfunaz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 184
  • Last login:March 07, 2006, 06:32:01 pm
  • "Super NinCadeO, Sega Genesis!!"
300 DPI needed?
« on: October 12, 2005, 01:21:08 am »
I got this one picture that I really want to use.
Its stats are:

1400 x 2059
19.4" x 28.6"

72 pixels/ inch

I want to make the picture about

mahuti

  • Wiki Master
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2757
  • Last login:March 02, 2022, 09:51:19 pm
  • I dare anything! I am Skeletor!
Re: 300 DPI needed?
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2005, 03:00:21 am »
If you choose not to resample the image when you scale it down, the effective DPI will be about 116 dpi... a little short of a recommended minimum of 150, and well short of a higher quality figure like 250-300. Newspapers generally print between about 56 to 120 dpi... cheap printed material (brochures, nice flyers) around 300, fine art books anywhere between 600 & 1200 dpi.
You can guess where you wanna be in that... If it's side art... it can be a little rougher. Bezel and CPO art should be higher quality (due to how close you will generally be when you look at it.)
Raspberry Pi, AttractMode, and Skeletor enthusiast.

Ldsfunaz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 184
  • Last login:March 07, 2006, 06:32:01 pm
  • "Super NinCadeO, Sega Genesis!!"
Re: 300 DPI needed?
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2005, 03:53:08 am »
so if i resample up to 250-300 dpi, then shrink it down to the size i need, the quality would still be crappy, but it won't have visible dots like a news paper?

I'm terrible at this....  :-\

mahuti

  • Wiki Master
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2757
  • Last login:March 02, 2022, 09:51:19 pm
  • I dare anything! I am Skeletor!
Re: 300 DPI needed?
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2005, 04:06:44 am »
Answer: You can't help yourself at all by scaling up if you want it to look better. Find a better source file if you are looking for better quality, or create something unique.


(a newspapers visible dots has to do with half-toning & dot gain ... more related to cheap processes and cheap paper... not really related to DPI, per se... my comment referred to a general coarse graniness of images in higher quality newspapers... like USA today.)
Raspberry Pi, AttractMode, and Skeletor enthusiast.

Ldsfunaz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 184
  • Last login:March 07, 2006, 06:32:01 pm
  • "Super NinCadeO, Sega Genesis!!"
Re: 300 DPI needed?
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2005, 04:32:03 am »
oh alright,

thanks mahuti, you have been alot of help.

I just don't understand where everyone gets these Huge images, for what i want, it needs to be like 3000x2000 , and i haven't seen anything like that.

oh well thanks again...

mahuti

  • Wiki Master
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2757
  • Last login:March 02, 2022, 09:51:19 pm
  • I dare anything! I am Skeletor!
Re: 300 DPI needed?
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2005, 04:45:04 am »
They don't... unless the images come from original sources, or repro houses. A lot of people stuff might look good in pictures, but doesn't withstand close-up scrutiny... cuz they upresed too.

Raspberry Pi, AttractMode, and Skeletor enthusiast.