| Main > Software Forum |
| Dual Mouse MAME |
| << < (2/3) > >> |
| millercentral:
BTW, AdvanceMAME supports multiple mice on both Linux and WindowsXP |
| MKChamp:
Question...if all I need is to get 2 lightguns working in xp, what advantages does analog v83.2(the last one to work in xp) have over advancemame? It looks like advancemame is more current/in synch with official mame. I am currently am running analog+ for my gun games, but there are games that have been released sinced 83.2 that I would like to play as well. To sum up, should I switch over to advancemame for my gun games? (I'm running xp sp2) |
| Silver:
From what I've read, current Advancemame has the most up-to-date code for 2 lightguns - it has specific support for dual actlabs and dual guncons (although it is using only 1 of the 2 available guncon drivers). The catch is that they have added there own "auto-calibration" which runs all the time - you just move the gun around the whole screen. Reportedly - although this works, it is nowhere near as accurate as calibrating using the drivers own setup. (I think this is guncon2 only) I've not tried it so can't report. What would be great is the rawinput type stuff advancemame incorporates being used in standard mame or derivative without the forced auto-calibration... |
| Cananas:
I am agree with you. We need a new version of nonamemame (and nonamemame32, of course) or mameanalog+(also with the mame32 version). Advancemame is very dependent of the hardware you have to configure the video. And it misses other features like streech hardware (i think) and some filters like triple buffering, etc... I am trying to configure properly for two months the video, to play with the correct resolution and correct frame rate. Of course I use windowsXP, the most abandon version of advancemame. Anyway, the question is: Why MameDev Team don't want to include the raw input for Windows 98 and XP into the regural version of mame windows? PD.- Doc, I built a cab based in your incredible work! |
| TheGatesofBill:
--- Quote from: ccuevasm on October 13, 2005, 04:19:58 am ---I am agree with you. We need a new version of nonamemame (and nonamemame32, of course) or mameanalog+(also with the mame32 version). --- End quote --- Working on it. College has been keeping me busy. I have a version of MAME 0.101 with a few changes, nothing worth releasing yet. I haven't had too much time to work. The first release won't be too impressive. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |